Gift this article

Use the options below to copy or email a special link so that friends or family can access this article without a subscription.
Happy Tuesday! Asked about his decision to accept a $400 million jumbo jet from the Qatari government on Monday, President Donald Trump quipped: “You should be embarrassed asking that question. … They’re giving us a free jet. I could say, ‘No, no, no, don’t give [it to] us. I want to pay you a billion or $400 million or whatever it is.’ Or I could say, ‘Thank you very much.’”
What is it they say about there being no such thing as a free lunch?
After a weekend of negotiations, the U.S. and China have agreed to a timeout in their high-stakes game of trade chicken. But to Beijing, that pause is looking more like a win. “China’s firm countermeasures and resolute stance have been highly effective,” CCTV, a Chinese state television channel, declared on Weibo.
Over the weekend, the two countries reached an agreement to dramatically reduce tariffs on one another’s goods—for now. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer met with Chinese officials in Switzerland to negotiate the temporary tariff reduction, prompting the stock market to surge as President Donald Trump praised a “total reset” in relations with China.
But the declaration may be premature. Although the U.S.’ 145 percent tariff and China’s 125 percent tariff have been walked back, 30 percent duties on Chinese goods and 10 percent taxes on American products remain. Beijing did not make any major concessions regarding its trade practices, and the tariff reduction itself is set to be in effect for only 90 days as negotiations continue. While the agreement gave a reprieve to businesses hurt by what was effectively a bilateral trade embargo, the uncertainty created by the Trump administration’s erratic trade policy isn’t likely to fade anytime soon.
There were high hopes going into the trade talks last week, as Bessent openly articulated the need for an off-ramp amid the escalating trade war: “Neither side thinks the status quo is sustainable,” he said ahead of the meeting.
And indeed, both American and Chinese companies have already felt the pain of the sweeping duties. Chinese factories have begun closing their doors en masse to move operations to neighboring countries like Vietnam, and, here in the U.S., port activity is down significantly, the effects of which will ripple through the supply chain. Meanwhile, small businesses in the U.S. that rely on imports have been forced to lay off employees and contemplate whether surviving the levies is even possible. Last week, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell warned that the country could face high unemployment, rising inflation, and a general economic slowdown if the tariffs remained in place.
Trump himself even seemed to grasp that the duties needed to come down. On Friday, ahead of the trade talks, he posted an uncharacteristically brief post to Truth Social: “80% Tariff on China seems right! Up to Scott B,” he said, referring to Bessent. An 80 percent tariff, despite representing a significant drop from 145 percent, would have still been prohibitive for many companies.
But after a weekend of negotiations between Washington and Beijing, the tariffs are now quite a bit lower than even the president’s pared-down suggestion, though still higher than before Trump took office. Bessent and Greer dropped the “reciprocal” tariffs on Chinese goods to 10 percent, in line with a trade deal the U.S. struck with the U.K. last week. But the U.S. tacked on an additional 20 percent duty on Beijing over its connection to fentanyl production, bringing the total tariff rate up to 30 percent. China, for its part, left a 10 percent tariff on American goods in place. If negotiations fail to yield progress during the 90-day window, the 10 percent levy on China will revert to the 34 percent “reciprocal” tariff implemented on April 2.
Before discussions began, Bessent said the goal of negotiations was de-escalation—not a full trade agreement. And little has seemed to emerge from the talks beyond reductions in the tariffs the Trump administration implemented last month. “Neither side wants a decoupling,” Bessent said at a press conference Monday. But Chinese officials were reportedly less interested in a “reset” than they were in gauging whether the U.S. was willing to step down its trade war, and it looks like they found their answer.
“The lesson the Chinese will learn is that Trump blinked. And that, essentially, he decided that the pain was too great—the markets reacted the way that they did—and he unwound all the tariffs without really getting any concessions from the Chinese,” David Sacks, a fellow for Asia studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, told TMD. “It’s hard to really understand what can be construed here as a victory.” The agreement failed to address China’s unfair trade practices, including intellectual property theft, forced technology transfers, currency manipulation, and excess capacity.
The talks did touch on the issue of fentanyl, however, with Bessent reportedly using sugar in a dish as a prop to demonstrate the potency of the drug to the Chinese representatives in the room. In a press conference following the meeting, Bessent praised China for bringing security and public safety officials to discuss the fentanyl crisis in America. The illicit drug is likely to be “a big part of the negotiations,” Sacks said. “But beyond that, I’m not really sure what else they are going to achieve over 90 days because I think that what the Chinese see is that they have a higher pain threshold than the Trump administration.”
Merely settling for a tariff reduction may have shown Beijing that the Trump administration is not operating strategically regarding its trade policy. “This is another signal to China that we’re not serious,” Derek Scissors, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, told TMD, explaining that the U.S. decision to back down could make the threat of future tariffs ring hollow.
The flip-flopping on trade barriers with China could also make it difficult to negotiate trade deals with other countries. “How does this affect what we’re now asking of partners and allies in the region and around the world?” Sacks said. “A part of the discussions with countries like Japan and Vietnam and Taiwan and South Korea was about pressuring them to do less [business] with China.” By lowering the tariffs on China, the U.S. signaled its eagerness to maintain an economic partnership with the country. Asking allies to decouple their own supply chains from China, then, may be significantly more challenging.
The trade talks may have given allies more negotiating power, though. By setting China’s tariff rates at 30 percent, it could signal ceiling on tariff rates for countries with closer relationships to the U.S. “We’ve kind of put ourselves into a box where the concession we make to the Chinese is automatically available to everyone else, unless we want to do something really stupid and harmful, which is treat other countries worse than China,” Scissors said.
Meanwhile, in the U.S., businesses will get some relief now that the 145 percent levy has been lifted. But they will still have to navigate a 30 percent tax, a rate that would have seemed exorbitant just a few months ago. “Most small businesses aren’t going to be able to afford that,” Peter Simon, an economics professor at Northeastern University, told TMD. “It’s still too high to be practical.”
Even if businesses can find a way to absorb or pass on the tariff costs, the uncertainty created by a constantly shifting trade policy makes for a difficult business environment. “Business operates off of certainty, and supply chain managers operate off of a mission to eliminate risk from supply chains,” Brian Bourke, the chief commercial officer at Illinois-based SEKO Logistics, told TMD. “Until there is certainty that enables supply chain managers to eliminate risk and optimize cost, I think it’s going to be a challenge.”
Bourke also explained that companies likely will try to stockpile inventory from China while the levies are low in the next 90 days—but many cargo vessels had already been repositioned into other routes after the tariffs escalated and demand decreased over the past month. The shipping issues could lead to a situation similar to the supply chain crisis in 2020, although Bourke thinks the problem will be less severe, since the higher tariffs were not in place for long. Still, businesses will continue to have to navigate the disruption from the Trump administration’s trade policy, and more changes might be coming soon as discussions with China continue.
Further negotiations will take place during the 90-day pause, but whether they can bring about substantive change in China’s trading practices in a short time period is uncertain. Purchase agreements could be reached, Sacks explained, but structural trade changes are harder to achieve.
“I think that there is enough time to put a limited deal together, but I think that the question that people have been asking remains open, which is: ‘What does Trump really want out of all of this? What are his objectives?’” Sacks said. “And I think that the Chinese are just as perplexed about that as many Americans.”
Axios: Trump Says European Union Is ‘Nastier Than China’
New York Times: Cuomo Loses $622,000 Over Concerns of Improper Super PAC Coordination
Former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo was denied more than $600,000 in public matching funds on Monday after the New York City Campaign Finance Board found that he most likely engaged in illicit coordination with a super PAC supporting his campaign for mayor.
ABC News: [Democratic] Gov. Gavin Newsom Urges California Cities and Counties to Ban Homeless Encampments
Two years after Dead & Company—a band comprising former Grateful Dead band members and guitarist and singer John Mayer—wrapped up its final tour, the band is back for a three-night concert in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park in August.
The Grateful Dead first played at the park’s Polo Fields in January 1967, and went on to perform there 13 more times throughout the 20th century.
Do you see the trade agreement with China as a win?