Is the Effort to Recall Gavin Newsom About ‘Telling People to Wear Masks’?
A Bernie Sanders tweet gets some facts about the recall petition wrong.
| Alec Dent | Mar 9 | 16 | 9 |
In a recent tweet, Sen. Bernie Sanders claimed that the effort to recall California Gov. Gavin Newsom was about punishing Newsom “for the crime of telling people to wear masks and for listening to scientists during COVID.”
The petition to recall Newsom was filed on February 20, 2020. Circulation of the petition was approved by the state government on June 10, 2020, and following a court case to extend the deadline four months given the circumstances of the pandemic the petitioners were given until March 17, 2021 to reach the required 1,495,709 signatures. (The number is 12 percent of the votes cast in California’s last gubernatorial election, the state’s threshold for a recall election. Signatures must come from at least five counties, with those signatures being equal to at least 1 percent of the votes cast in each county.) Organizers say they currently have nearly 2 million signatures, as they’ve attempted to surpass the required 12 percent to ensure they’ll still be above the bar once repeat and illegitimate signatures are removed during the signature verification process.
One website that is part of the recall effort, recallgavin2020.com, does include a list of reasons to recall Newsom that features criticisms of his pandemic response. But, notably, the recall petition itself says nothing about Newsom’s pandemic response. This shouldn’t come as a surprise—the petition was, after all, submitted to the government on February 20, 2020, before the coronavirus pandemic response began in earnest. Newsom didn’t declare a state of emergency until March 4 and didn’t begin to limit gatherings until March 12, the first step in the state’s COVID lockdown. The petition lists the grounds for the recall as:
“Governor Newsom has implemented laws which are detrimental to the citizens of this state and our way of life. Laws he endorsed favor foreign nationals, in our country illegally, over that of our own citizens. People in this state suffer the highest taxes in the nation, the highest homelessness rates, and the lowest quality of life as a result. He has imposed sanctuary state status and fails to enforce immigration laws. He unilaterally over-ruled the will of the people regarding the death penalty. He seeks to impose additional burdens on our state by the following; removing the protections of Proposition 13, rationing our water use, increasing taxes and restricting parental rights.”
Since the pandemic began, the activists behind the petition have made no secret of the fact that they believe “the Governor’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic only heightens the urgency of a recall” and that Newsom’s pandemic response actions “have taken a central importance to the recall campaign.”
Much of the criticism Newsom has faced from the public for his pandemic response has been not for “following the science,” as Sanders alleges, but for delays in getting unemployment checks out, inconsistency in implementing, rescinding, and then reimplementing guidance for the state, and for lockdowns that went further than what science actually indicated was necessary.
Sanders’ tweet is, thus, only partly true: The current motivation of the petition organizers may be tied to Newson’s pandemic response, but the recall effort was not incited by what Newsom has done during the coronavirus pandemic nor do the reasons for recalling Newsom stated in the petition have anything to do with the pandemic.
If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.
| 16 | 9 |
I live in California and the people who sit outside the grocery store to get signatures have no idea what the Governor does. They don't like him because he's from San Francisco. Just as point of reference, there are @ 40 million people in California. That's more than Canada.
Let's see if can answer their complaints. High gas prices. Yes because there are millions of people who drive on the streets and highways. High taxes, because people want to live here so a lot of services are needed. My daughter didn't want to pay high taxes so she moved to Las Vegas. You don't like High taxes then move.
Lots of homeless. It's true. In January there many days in the 70's. In Cincinnati, where my brother lives, it was between 10 to 20 degrees. If you didn't have a home where would you live? I wish people who complained about the homeless could come up with what to do with all the homeless. I'm eager to hear a solution.
Illegal immigrants - who do you think picks all the almonds, strawberries and grapes for your wine. I spent one summer picking grapes when I was a teen. Hardest job I ever had. If farmers had to pay Americans, your produce would be 5 times higher.
I agree, there should be fewer immigrants, but until these countries in the south can raise their standard of living and elect honest, reasonable governments, people will keep fleeing.
Living in CA, I would say that Newsom's response to the COVD crisis has created lots of momentum for the recall petition, but I don't think that anti-mask sentiment is that important. Basically there is not a lot of ant-mask sentiment in CA. There IS increasing resentment against the lockdowns and the Governor's trip to the French Laundry greatly increased that sentiment. The inability of the large school districts to open schools has been a significant factor also.