Messy Chaotic Lanes
| Sarah Isgur | Feb 13, 2020 | 5 | 3 |
 |  |  |
| 0:00 | -1:09:21 |
Sarah and the guys examine the results of the New Hampshire primary, dive into the debate over electability and the importance of ideological lanes, and discuss the impact going forward of the move to lessen a sentencing recommendation for Roger Stone.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
| 5 | 3 |
I'm here for the King Ralph content! It seems that Trump is final episode of a century long project to errode the constraints on the executive branch. Obama (administration) was more adroit at rewarding friends and punishing enemies. The next president (for example Bloomberg), now unrestrained, directing compliant executive bureaucracy is going to be on a mission "to get [unconstitutional] things done." Ironically Trump is the clearest warning of danger ahead as "The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away."
Just finished listening to the latest episode. I was wondering if the recent reporting by Kimberly Strassel at the WSJ, on the timeline and series of events surrounding the DOJ, AG Barr, and The President’s Tweets about Stones sentencing, might change or alter the reporting and discussion of those same events. Specifically, although the President’s behavior and tweeting is wrong. I have not seen or heard any evidence suggesting that AG Barr’s actions were in anyway improper or inappropriately influenced. Have I missed something? is there any reasonable basis for questioning AG Barr’s integrity?