The Dispatch
Share this post
The Sweep: The Politics of the January 6 Hearings
thedispatch.com

The Sweep: The Politics of the January 6 Hearings

Plus: Cross-party friendships, and the gender gap lives on.

Sarah Isgur
and
Audrey Fahlberg
Jun 14
78
36
Share this post
The Sweep: The Politics of the January 6 Hearings
thedispatch.com
Reps. Zoe Lofgren and Bennie Thompson (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Last week Axios reported the very unsurprising news that “Google Trends data shows midterm voters have ‘very low interest’ in Jan. 6 compared to topics like jobs, taxes and gun policy.” It also noted that a recent poll found that only 42 percent of Americans “support efforts to hold the Jan. 6 rioters accountable, down 10 points from a year ago.”

Anytime a party focuses on something that a majority of voters either aren’t interested in or don’t agree with (or both, in this case), there’s a risk of an own goal. Republicans can point to the hearings and argue Democrats are out of touch with voters on things like inflation and gas prices. 

So why are they doing it? Certainly there’s an argument to be made that there’s the principle of the whole thing. Posterity. But don’t forget small dollar fundraising. Axios has tracked more than 500 fundraising emails in the last month from Democratic campaigns, party committees and independent political spenders, including the DCCC and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, that are tied to the January 6 attack or investigation. 

This post is for Dispatch Members only

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2022 The Dispatch
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing