The Dispatch
Share this post
Was the CDC Director ‘Totally Misquoted’ on the Risk of a Second Coronavirus Wave?
thedispatch.com

Was the CDC Director ‘Totally Misquoted’ on the Risk of a Second Coronavirus Wave?

Nope.

Alec Dent
Apr 23, 2020
22
11
Share this post
Was the CDC Director ‘Totally Misquoted’ on the Risk of a Second Coronavirus Wave?
thedispatch.com

During the daily coronavirus task force press briefing Wednesday, President Trump claimed that CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield was “totally misquoted in the media on a statement about the fall season and the virus.” The quotes in question came from an interview of Redfield with the Washington Post. The Post reported Redfield’s comments this way: 

“There’s a possibility that the assault of the virus on our nation next winter will actually be even more difficult than the one we just went through,” CDC Director Robert Redfield said in an interview with The Washington Post. “And when I’ve said this to others, they kind of put their head back, they don’t understand what I mean.”

“We’re going to have the flu epidemic and the coronavirus epidemic at the same time,” he said.

Trump accused the Post and CNN, which used the Redfield quotes from the Post in a separate story, of inaccurate and misleading reporting. Trump claimed Redfield “was talking about the flu and corona coming together at the same time and corona could be just some little flare-ups that we'll take care of.” White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany made similar claims Wednesday afternoon during a Fox News interview and an informal press briefing. Earlier in the day, President Trump had complained on Twitter that Redfield was “totally misquoted by fake news CNN.” 

Redfield did encourage people to get the flu shot during the interview, but it’s clear from the language he used in the interview—“the assault of the virus on our nation next winter”—that his increased concern about the flu is due to his desire to limit the strain put on hospitals, allowing them to focus on coronavirus cases. 

Redfield shared the Washington Post article on his Twitter feed without any objections about the framing of his interview.

Trump is on stronger ground in his claim that “The headline in the Washington Post was totally inaccurate. The statement wasn't bad in the Post, but the headline was ridiculous." The headline of the Post’s article reads: “CDC director warns second wave of coronavirus is likely to be even more devastating.” But in the portion of the interview published by the Post, Redfield merely said “there’s a possibility” that the second wave will be “even more difficult.” The headline isn’t “totally inaccurate” but it makes Redfield’s claim seem a stronger expression of certitude than his actual words.

Redfield’s interview with the Post is consistent with his past comments. On March 30, he told an NPR affiliate that the CDC was preparing for “another wave that we would anticipate in the late fall, early winter where there will still be a substantial portion of Americans that are susceptible.”

The Trump campaign sent a tweet Wednesday evening that contained a video of Redfield from the press briefing Wednesday, reasserting the claim that he was “misquoted.” While Redfield said it was important to clarify his meaning, he did not say that he was misquoted.

Twitter avatar for @TeamTrumpTeam Trump (Text TRUMP to 88022) @TeamTrump
CDC Director Dr. Redfield clarifies his remarks on the #Coronavirus after being totally misquoted by the Fake News!
Image

April 22nd 2020

1,325 Retweets3,171 Likes

And what that video leaves out is what Redfield said about two and a half minutes later, when pressed by ABC’s Jonathan Karl:

“I am accurately quoted in the Washington Post.”

If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.

Photograph by Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images.

11
Share this post
Was the CDC Director ‘Totally Misquoted’ on the Risk of a Second Coronavirus Wave?
thedispatch.com
11 Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only Dispatch Members only can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

Pat Riot
Apr 23, 2020

What is short-circuiting Trump and the Republicans here is that *you can't lie about immediate reality*.

The plain fact is that as a nation we need to prepare for a second wave of the epidemic (with the understanding that, if we prepare carefully enough, we will get through it with minimal loss of life and jobs).

But Trump is bifurcating Americans thusly:

1. Some see Mr. Redfield's statement in a political light, and root for Trump and the Republicans to prevail. They try to understand his political bias, what he does to help or hurt Trump's chances in the coming election, and how this effects their ongoing misson to own the libs.

2. Some see Mr. Redfield's statement as a matter of fact, and prepare themselves, their family, their schedules, plans, businesses, stock portfolios, schools, etc. based on those facts (and that the "fact" here is a non-exact prediction is beside the point--such plans based on that are made all of the time, even most of the time).

Trump is dividing the USA into normal, prudent, small-c conservative people and... mindless idiots who don't give a single thought about what will happen any further out than the day after tomorrow.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
Bruce Wing
Writes Rights & Responsibilities (R&R) Apr 23, 2020

The man is killing me (no pun intended). Anyone that has bothered to look knows that the Spanish Flu hit in 3 waves...and the 2nd was much more lethal than the first. The Hong Kong Flu that hit in '68 came in two waves also... and the 2nd wave was worst than the first. In both viruses, doctors tend to believe the R0 factor increased, making the disease more infectious than the first wave...thus leading to more deaths.

I respect anyone saying that holing up at home is not a viable tactic for long. However, why can't Trump simply say that until there is a cure or a 100% protective vaccine, there will be deaths when the economy re-opens? It was a rhetorical question. I know. Trump is an idiot.

BTW, if you haven't seen it, Marco Rubio did a fantastic job of communicating the message in exactly the right tone the other day in a YouTube video.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
9 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 The Dispatch
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing