Less than two weeks after a Manhattan jury found Donald Trump guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records, Judge Juan Merchan sent a letter to attorneys for both the prosecution and defense, highlighting the existence of a Facebook comment that purported to reveal the jury’s verdict before it was officially announced. Jurors were instructed not to reveal the case’s verdict to anyone in advance, but it is unknown whether Merchan sent the letter only out of an abundance of caution or if the court had serious concerns about the verdict being leaked.
“Today, the Court became aware of a comment that was posted on the Unified Court System’s public Facebook page and which I now bring to your attention,” Merchan wrote. The letter identified a comment—posted a day before Trump’s May 30 guilty verdict—from someone who claimed their cousin was a juror and had already told him the jury’s decision: that Trump would be convicted.
“Thank you for all your hard [work] against the MAGA crazies!” it read. “My cousin is a juror on Trumps criminal case and they’re going to convict him tomorrow according to her. Thank you 🙏 New York courts!!!!! ❤️”
The user’s claim was quickly identified as bogus and the product of online trolling, but not before it prompted widespread reactions. A number of Trump supporters, Republican politicians, and online commentators immediately called for a mistrial. “Uh oh! It looks like there was juror misconduct in the #TrumpTrial!” attorney and Townhall contributor Phil Holloway tweeted.* “We knew these jurors would not be able to avoid telling their friends and relatives that were going to get Trump. It’s time for a mistrial ‘with prejudice’ and no retrial!”
The comment in question, which has since been removed, was made on a May 20 post celebrating Associate Justice Jeffrey K. Oing on the New York State Unified Court System’s Facebook page. User Michael Anderson responded to the post, thanking the court for its hard work against Trump and his supporters and claiming that a juror had told him the verdict in advance.
The comment’s veracity was immediately called into question because of the trollish nature of the commenter’s account. On the user’s main page, which has since been made private, they describe themselves as a “professional sh-t poster,” meaning they purposefully post content intended to be provocative, absurd, or offensive. The user’s page also includes an image depicting their account being restricted and a banner reading “Facebook. Wasting peoples lives since 2004.”
Suspicions about the post’s legitimacy were confirmed when the user, copying a definition from Wikipedia, clarified that his posts were “intentionally designed to derail discussions or cause the biggest reaction with the least effort.”
Despite the comment being identified as spurious on June 7, the claim—that Trump’s verdict had been leaked in advance—continued to circulate among pro-Trump influencers. The former president himself reposted an article about the story on Truth Social two days later, adding just one word: “MISTRIAL!”
Clarification, June 11, 2024: This fact check originally identified Phil Holloway as a Fox News legal analyst. He has appeared on Fox News several times in recent months to analyze legal matters, but he is not employed by the network.
If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.
