Skip to content
No, the Harris Campaign Did Not Spend $583 Million on Staff
Go to my account

No, the Harris Campaign Did Not Spend $583 Million on Staff

A viral post wildly exaggerates what the vice president spent on payroll.

Vice President Kamala Harris acknowledges the crowd during a campaign rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, on November 2, 2024. (Photo by Charly Triballeau/ AFP/Getty Images)

Did the Kamala Harris campaign spend almost $600 million on staff during the presidential election? Several viral posts claim that Harris’ campaign committee spent more than 50 times as much on staff as Trump’s campaign committee.

“Wonder who is painting a better picture for America?” reads the earliest version of the post, which was shared on X by podcaster Justin Blinson on November 8. The post lists fundraising and spending totals for both Trump and Harris, as well as the amounts they spent on campaign staff. In a response to his post, Blinson cites OpenSecrets—a non-profit that compiles campaign finance data—as the source of his information. As of November 20, the post had gained more than 4.6 million views on X. 

Billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman shared Blinson’s post on November 19, drawing an additional 4.2 million views. “How is it possible that the @KamalaHarris campaign spent $583 million, nearly $6 million per day, on her campaign staff in her 103-day campaign while @realDonaldTrump’s spending on staff was $10.4 million or $100,970 per day, 1/60th as much,” Ackman asks in the post. “The numbers don’t compute. This smells like fraud and/or corruption.” 

An image with the information has since spread to social media sites including Instagram, Threads, and Facebook

While the figures for each campaign’s fundraising and for Trump campaign’s overall spending are accurate, the claim about Harris’ staffing expenses is false. Harris’ presidential campaign committee did not spend $582.53 million on personnel.

“The Harris staff number is not true,” Brendan Glavin, deputy research director at OpenSecrets, told The Dispatch Fact Check in an email. Using Federal Election Commission (FEC) data, Glavin found that Harris’ campaign committee—Harris for President—spent only around $22.2 million on payroll expenses, far less than the $582.53 million claimed in the posts. A majority of the Harris campaign’s expenditures went toward advertising buys and media production. “Media spending was responsible for about 75 percent of all the campaign’s reported expenditures,” Glavin explained. FEC data indicates that Trump’s campaign committee spent approximately $7.8 million on payroll.

According to OpenSecrets, the Harris presidential committee had raised $1.003 billion and spent $916.77 million as of October 16, 2024. These totals include fundraising and expenditures previously made by Biden’s campaign committee, which was renamed for Harris when she became the Democratic nominee. Donald Trump’s presidential committee—Donald J Trump for President 2024—raised $381.54 million and spent $345.32 million during the same period. Final fundraising numbers for both campaigns, including expenditures made in the weeks immediately preceding Election Day, will not be available until early December when each presidential committee files a final post-general election report with the FEC.

If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.

Alex Demas is a fact checker at The Dispatch and is based in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining the company in 2023, he worked in England as a financial journalist and earned his MA in Political Economy at King's College London. When not heroically combating misinformation online, Alex can be found mixing cocktails, watching his beloved soccer team Aston Villa lose a match, or attempting to pet stray cats.

Share with a friend

Your membership includes the ability to share articles with friends. Share this article with a friend by clicking the button below.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.

You are currently using a limited time guest pass and do not have access to commenting. Consider subscribing to join the conversation.

With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.