Skip to content
Sorting Out Claims That Americans Could Receive a $5,000 ‘DOGE Dividend’
Go to my account

Sorting Out Claims That Americans Could Receive a $5,000 ‘DOGE Dividend’

Such a proposal is under consideration, but there are mitigating factors.

Are Donald Trump and Elon Musk going to send savings from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) back to the American people? Dozens of viral posts claim that the White House is considering a plan to either send Americans $5,000 checks or give taxpayers a $5,000 tax credit, all paid for by DOGE’s cost-cutting measures. “#ElonMusk is proposing a $5,000 tax refund for every American funded by the savings generated from DOGE,” says one Instagram post. A Facebook user shared an article from Forbes headlined “Musk Mulls Sending All Americans $5,000 Checks Using DOGE Savings.” 

Musk and Trump have both said that they are considering a plan to return 20 percent of DOGE’s savings to Americans. However, the payments would be limited to Americans who pay net income taxes and are unlikely to be as high as $5,000.

The idea for a “DOGE Dividend” originated Tuesday when James Fishback, an entrepreneur and investor, posted a four-page proposal on X calling for the Trump administration to return 20 percent of DOGE’s total savings to Americans via tax refunds. The plan argues that $5,000 could be returned to each of America’s approximately 79 million households that are net payers of income tax.

Several hours later, Elon Musk responded to the post, saying that he would “check with the President,” about it. By Thursday, the idea had reached Trump who, in a speech at an event in Miami Beach, said that the idea was being considered by the administration. “There’s even, under consideration, a new concept where we give 20 percent of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20 percent goes to paying down debt,” Trump said.

While Musk and Trump have said they are considering the plan, it is unlikely that American taxpayers would receive $5,000. The analysis relies on DOGE’s initial $2 trillion savings target, which would provide $400 billion for the proposed “DOGE Dividend.” However, economists question—some seriously—whether $2 trillion in savings is a reasonable, let alone achievable, target. “It is virtually impossible for DOGE to immediately cut $2 trillion from the $7 trillion federal budget,” Jessica Riedl, an economist at the Manhattan Institute, told The Dispatch Fact Check. “Right now, two-thirds of all spending goes to Social Security, Medicare, defense, veterans, and interest, all of which has been taken off the table by President Trump. That would force DOGE to eliminate nearly all other spending, including for Medicaid, SNAP, infrastructure, federal prisons, homeland security, embassies, school lunches, disability, public health, nuclear weapons management, student loans, national parks, and border security.” Musk himself walked back his initial $2 trillion target last month, saying in an interview that there was only a good shot of cutting half that amount.

According to Riedl, DOGE also faces significant legal hurdles to such drastic spending cuts. “DOGE does not even have the legal or constitutional authority to impose cuts of this magnitude,” Riedl added. “That would constitute an illegal impoundment. Congress would need to pass such legislation, and the president would have to sign it.”

If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.

Alex Demas is a fact checker at The Dispatch and is based in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining the company in 2023, he worked in England as a financial journalist and earned his MA in Political Economy at King's College London. When not heroically combating misinformation online, Alex can be found mixing cocktails, watching his beloved soccer team Aston Villa lose a match, or attempting to pet stray cats.

Gift this article to a friend

Your membership includes the ability to share articles with friends. Share this article with a friend by clicking the button below.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.

With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.