Divided Argument hosts Daniel Epps and William Baude join Sarah Isgur to unpack the Supreme Court’s decision (ahem, non-decision) on birthright citizenship. Plus: a little showdown between two justices.
The Agenda:
—What the Supreme Court did NOT decide
—What the Court DID decide
—Similarities to Marbury v. Madison,Loper Bright, and Chevron
—Justice Amy Coney Barrett v. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson
—Judicial supremacy?
—Sir, this is not a Denny’s
—Injunction influx
—The future of forum shopping
—A big July for Advisory Opinion
Show Notes:
—SCOTUSblog on the 6-3 decision itself
This episode is brought to you by Burford Capital, the leading global finance firm focused on law.
Burford helps companies and law firms unlock the value of their legal assets. With a $7.2 billion portfolio and listings on the NYSE and LSE, Burford provides capital to finance high-value commercial litigation and arbitration—without adding cost, risk, or giving up control.
Clients include Fortune 500 companies and Am Law 100 firms, who turn to Burford to pursue strong claims, manage legal costs, and accelerate recoveries.
Learn more at burfordcapital.com/ao.
Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.
With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.