Skip to content
Separation Anxiety: Courts and Congress
Go to my account

Separation Anxiety: Courts and Congress

Open your hymnals to Article II.

Sarah Isgur and David French discuss Alina Habba’s removal as U.S. attorney pick and the one consistent position of the Trump administration: We get to do what we want.

—Scrutinizing the Vacancies Reform Act
—Friendly vs. hostile U.S. Senates
—Good luck to the criminals in the Northern District of New Jersey
—Listener question: change the vesting clause?
Second Circuit issues decision on remand for Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am. v. Vullo.
If you’re going to charge a conspiracy, there better be a conspiracy
Critical race theory curriculum
—Poisonous fruit of the Garcetti tree
Who has rights over blood spots?

This episode is brought to you by Burford Capital, the leading global finance firm focused on law.

Burford helps companies and law firms unlock the value of their legal assets. With a $7.2 billion portfolio and listings on the NYSE and LSE, Burford provides capital to finance high-value commercial litigation and arbitration—without adding cost, risk, or giving up control.

Clients include Fortune 500 companies and Am Law 100 firms, who turn to Burford to pursue strong claims, manage legal costs, and accelerate recoveries.

Listen on your player of choice

Sarah Isgur is a senior editor at The Dispatch and is based in northern Virginia. Prior to joining the company in 2019, she had worked in every branch of the federal government and on three presidential campaigns. When Sarah is not hosting podcasts or writing newsletters, she’s probably sending uplifting stories about spiders to Jonah, who only pretends to love all animals.

David French is a columnist for the New York Times. He’s a former senior editor of The Dispatch. He’s the author most recently of Divided We Fall: America's Secession Threat and How to Restore Our Nation.

Gift this article to a friend

Your membership includes the ability to share articles with friends. Share this article with a friend by clicking the button below.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.

With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.