A viral Facebook post from anti-Israel page Exposing Israel’s Agenda claims that George Clooney rejected a $35 million offer from an Israeli airline to appear in a commercial because “he doesn’t support the occupation state of ‘Israel.”
The basis for this claim is an interview Clooney did with The Guardian in which he revealed: “I was offered $35m for one day’s work for an airline commercial, but I talked to Amal [Clooney, the human rights lawyer he married in 2014] about it and we decided it’s not worth it. It was [associated with] a country that, although it’s an ally, is questionable at times, and so I thought: ‘Well, if it takes a minute’s sleep away from me, it’s not worth it.’”
At no point in the interview did Clooney identify what airline he was referring to, and there are plenty of possibilities based on the scant details that Clooney gave. An airline associated with an ally to the United States that’s “questionable at times” could refer to, among others, Turkish Airlines, owned in part by the government of Turkey; Emirates or Etihad Airways, owned by governments in the United Arab Emirates; Qatar Airways, owned by the government of Qatar; or Saudia, owned by the government of Saudi Arabia. All are airlines associated with countries considered allies of the United States government, but that have histories of human rights abuses.
What’s more, Stan Rosenfield, Clooney’s publicist, told The Dispatch Fact Check that the country in question “was not Israel.”
Clooney has not said he rejected a commercial offer from an Israeli airline because he thinks it is an occupation state. Such claims read into his quote far more than is merited with what information he provided, and Clooney denies that the airline in question is from Israel.
If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.
Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.
You are currently using a limited time guest pass and do not have access to commenting. Consider subscribing to join the conversation.
With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.