Skip to content
Yes, a GOP Representative Introduced a Constitutional Amendment to Let Trump Run Again
Go to my account

Yes, a GOP Representative Introduced a Constitutional Amendment to Let Trump Run Again

The resolution would have to pass Congress, then be ratified by 38 states.

President Donald Trump waves as he arrives with Vice President J.D. Vance and first lady Melania Trump during an indoor inaugural parade at Capital One Arena on January 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)

Several social media posts claim that a Republican congressman proposed a constitutional amendment that would allow Donald Trump to run for president again in 2028. “BREAKING: Republican Congressman Andy Ogles has drafted a constitutional amendment to allow Donald Trump to be president for a third term,” reads one Threads post. “A Tennessee Republican Proposes An Amendment To Allow President Donald Trump To Run For A Third Term,” reads another on Instagram. 

The claims are true. Last week, Rep. Andy Ogles proposed an amendment that would do just that.

On January 23, Ogles—a second-term Republican representing Tennessee’s 5th District—introduced a joint resolution that would allow a president to serve a third term if they had not yet served two consecutive terms in office. Trump, whose first and current terms were non-consecutive, would thus be allowed to run for a third term in the future. Presidents are presently limited to serving only two terms in office by the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The full text of the proposed amendment’s article reads:

“No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.”

The joint resolution would need to receive a two-thirds majority vote in both the House and Senate before the proposed amendment could be sent to the states for ratification. Three-fourths of the states would then need to approve the amendment before it could become law. No constitutional amendments have been ratified in the U.S. since 1992 when the 27th Amendment—which was initially proposed in 1789 and which prevents congressional representatives from voting for immediate pay increases—was ratified following a decade-long nationwide campaign.

If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.

Alex Demas is a fact checker at The Dispatch and is based in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining the company in 2023, he worked in England as a financial journalist and earned his MA in Political Economy at King's College London. When not heroically combating misinformation online, Alex can be found mixing cocktails, watching his beloved soccer team Aston Villa lose a match, or attempting to pet stray cats.

Gift this article to a friend

Your membership includes the ability to share articles with friends. Share this article with a friend by clicking the button below.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.

With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.