Kannon Shanmugam and his summer associates return to Advisory Opinions to look back on the SCOTUS term and discuss the state of “text, history, and tradition.”
The Agenda:
—Big themes from this SCOTUS term
—Was this the administrative law term?
—Should we stop thinking about SCOTUS “terms”?
—The health of the First Amendment
—“The media now owns Amy Coney Barrett”
—Justice Thomas’ dissent in Rahimi
—Sarah’s summary of this term
—Questions from summer associates
Show Notes:
—Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
—Moody v. NetChoice
—FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
—National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo
—SEC v. Jarkesy
—Trump v. Anderson
—Trump v. United States
—United States v. Rahimi
—New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen
—Justice SamuelAlito’s WSJ op-ed
—Sarah’s 3-3-3 theory
—Christian Laettner’s shot against Kentucky
Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.