On today’s episode, David and Sarah break down the most interesting Supreme Court argument of this term and what it means for the future of double jeopardy law. But first, they have to shout out the dating site that is the AO comment section. Also on the docket:
-Mistrials vs. double jeopardy
-Federal rights and state interpretations
-The coolest word you’ve never used
-David calls for thoughtful comments
-How to lose with valor at SCOTUS
-Fifth circuit on the brain
-A second bite of the Rahimi apple
-Revealing AO’s next long-awaited guest
Show notes:
Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.
You are currently using a limited time guest pass and do not have access to commenting. Consider subscribing to join the conversation.
With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.