As of Dec. 5, President Trump had tweeted 14 times since October 3 that he maintains a 95 percent approval rating with Republicans.
From July to September, he put this number at 94 percent. From February to March, he said it was 93 percent.
The uptick in these tweets—which usually have a succinct “Thank You!” appended to them—makes sense. Nancy Pelosi formally announced the Democratic-led House’s impeachment inquiry on September 24, putting Trump’s political life on the line and creating a situation where Republican unity around this president is more important than it’s ever been.
The only problem? Trump has never cited a source for this 95 percent figure—which has remained remarkably consistent over the past two months—and public polling on the topic shows his GOP support to be lower. In fact, an ABC News/Washington Post poll conducted in late October found Trump hitting record-low approval among Republicans at 74 percent, down from a high of 87 percent in July. Gallup presents a rosier outlook for Trump, pegging his approval within the GOP at 90 percent in mid-November.
The true figure is likely somewhere in between. Individual polls contain high levels of variance, looking at averages and trends over time is typically a much safer bet.
And a number between 74 percent and 90 percent approval among Republicans is a strong showing! George W. Bush’s GOP rating dropped to 55 percent in the throes of the financial crisis. Even Ronald Reagan’s fell to 67 percent for a period in 1983.
When referencing his overall approval rating, Trump almost always cites his sources. (Those sources are almost always Rasmussen, a pollster that consistently places his favorability several points ahead of polling averages.)
But the 95 percent figure among Republicans comes unaccompanied by a link or a graphic. It’s possible Trump is citing internal polling from his campaign or the RNC. It’s possible Trump is citing support among elected Republicans in the House or Senate. It’s also possible, and perhaps most likely, Trump is citing nothing at all, fabricating this number to bolster party support at a time that he needs it most.
Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.
You are currently using a limited time guest pass and do not have access to commenting. Consider subscribing to join the conversation.
With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.