Skip to content
The Morning Dispatch: State of the Union
Go to my account

The Morning Dispatch: State of the Union

President Biden took a victory lap on signature policies, but declined to recalibrate his agenda despite drooping approval ratings.

Happy (Ash) Wednesday! We hope all who are observing have a blessed Lent.

Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories

  • The International Energy Agency announced yesterday its member countries—the U.S., Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and most of Europe—agreed to release a combined 60 million barrels of oil from their emergency reserves to “send a unified and strong message” that there will be “no shortfall in supplies” due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. With the price of oil at an eight-year high, White House National Economic Council Deputy Director Bharat Ramamurti on Tuesday encouraged U.S. oil and gas companies to increase production: “Prices are quite high, the price signal is strong. If folks want to produce more, they can and they should.”

  • The governments of Poland, Bulgaria, and Slovakia contradicted promises made by EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrel over the weekend, making clear they will not be donating fighter jets to the Ukrainian war effort. It’s unclear whether Borrel spoke out of turn before an agreement was finalized, or the countries backtracked out of fears of escalating the situation with Russia further. The European Union reportedly agreed to cut seven Russian banks from the SWIFT financial-messaging system, exempting two of its largest, Sberbank and Gazprombank.

  • U.S. tech giants announced a series of additional moves on Tuesday in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Google announced YouTube would join Meta and TikTok in blocking Russian state media outlets RT and Sputnik in Europe, and Meta said it was tweaking its algorithms to stop recommending the two outlets’ content worldwide. Instagram rolled out encrypted direct messaging for users in Ukraine and Russia. Apple announced it was pausing product sales and limiting functionality of Apple Pay in Russia, and removing RT and Sputnik apps from its App Store outside of Russia.

  • Following similar decisions from BP and Shell, ExxonMobil announced Tuesday it was “beginning the process” of discontinuing operations and exiting its joint Sakhalin-1 oil and gas venture in Russia. “​​The process to discontinue operations will need to be carefully managed and closely coordinated with the co-venturers in order to ensure it is executed safely,” the company said.

  • President Joe Biden announced in his State of the Union address last night the United States would join the European Union, United Kingdom, and Canada in banning Russian planes from its airspace.

  • Texas kicked off the 2022 primary season on Tuesday. Incumbent GOP Gov. Greg Abbott and Democratic challenger Beto O’Rourke will face off in the general election, but Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, failing to reach 50 percent of the vote, appears headed for a runoff with Texas land commissioner (and Jeb Bush’s son) George P. Bush.

State of the Union

(Photo by Jim Lo Scalzo-Pool/Getty Images.)

As a rule of thumb, the political stakes of a president’s annual State of the Union (SOTU) are far lower than cable news pundits would have you believe. Just 10 to 15 percent of the country tends to tune into the address in a given year, and that 10 to 15 percent is overwhelmingly made up of viewers predisposed to like what they hear. The president is preaching to the choir—and to morning newsletter editors whose job requires them to watch the speech instead of, say, a Big Ten Championship game between Wisconsin and Purdue. [Editor: Go Badgers!] According to Gallup polling dating back to the Carter administration, the SOTU address tends to boost a president’s approval rating by an average of … 0.4 percentage points. 

What the annual pageantry does provide, however, is a window into how the current presidential administration views itself—and the White House demonstrated last night it has not yet accepted the grave reality of its political situation. In a CBS News/YouGov poll published Tuesday, nearly seven in 10 respondents described things in America as going “somewhat” or “very” badly, and Biden’s approval numbers were well underwater on the economy, inflation, crime, immigration, and the situation in Ukraine.

White House speechwriters had to scramble in recent days to add nearly 1,200 words about that final issue, as the president obviously needed to deliver a different address yesterday than he would have one week earlier. “Putin’s latest attack on Ukraine was premeditated and totally unprovoked,” Biden said, moments after recognizing the Ukrainian ambassador to the United States for a bipartisan standing ovation. “He thought the West and NATO would not respond. He thought he could divide us at home in this chamber and this nation. And he thought he could divide us in Europe as well. But Putin was wrong. We are ready. We are united.”

After praising the strength and fearlessness of the Ukrainian people and their president, Biden turned to what his administration has done: declassifying months of intelligence about the Kremlin’s next steps, building consensus among European allies (“even Switzerland”), crippling the Russian economy with sanctions, releasing 30 million barrels of oil from the strategic reserves to counteract reduced global supply, raising the temperature on Putin and Russia’s oligarchs directly.

“The battle between democracy and autocracy, democracies are rising to the moment. The world is clearly choosing the side of peace and security,” Biden said. “While it shouldn’t have taken something so terrible for people around the world to see what is at stake, now everyone sees it clearly.”

In an alternate world, that line could have served as a jumping off point for Biden to unveil a pivot away from the approach that dropped his net approval rating from +16.8 on March 1, 2021 to -12.5 on March 1, 2022. It’s easy to imagine how that might have looked: Putin’s invasion—and rising prices for Americans here at home—remind us just how important America’s energy independence is, which is why my administration is shifting toward an all-of-the-above energy strategy while continuing to work towards an emissions-free future. We’ve had some tough partisan battles over the past year, but it’s clear parts of my agenda don’t have enough support to make it to my desk—let’s redouble our efforts on finding the places most of us agree, like sending additional military and humanitarian aid to the Ukrainians.

But as the one-hour-and-two-minute speech wore on, it became increasingly obvious Biden and his team viewed the first section on Ukraine—which earned multiple bipartisan rounds of applause—as distinct from the remainder of the address and not describing a once-in-a-generation threat to the world order around which his presidency should reorient. Looking at the White House transcript of his remarks, we wouldn’t blame you for thinking Biden’s speechwriter simply copy-and-pasted the new language in at the top, shifting the pre-invasion version of the speech down a few paragraphs but otherwise leaving it untouched.

There was little new in the remainder of the address if you’ve been paying attention to Biden over the past year. He touted the American Rescue Plan and bipartisan infrastructure law, crediting the former with giving Americans a little “breathing room” against rising prices despite multiple Democratic economists pointing to the law as a key contributor to inflation. He came prepared with a long to-do list for Congress: Confirm his Federal Reserve nominees, pass legislation aimed at bolstering American competition with China, ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, support Democrats’ changes to federal election law, secure the border, provide a pathway to citizenship for DREAMers, codify abortion and LGBTQ protections into federal law.

Biden never said the words “Build Back Better,” but he devoted a significant portion of his speech to describing the contents of his multi-trillion dollar reconciliation package. CSPAN’s cameras repeatedly panned to Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin—who tanked BBB negotiations in December, and was sitting with Republicans last night—as the president jumped from prescription drug prices, to climate change, to childcare, to tax increases on corporations and the wealthy. “They just can’t help themselves,” the West Virginian told reporters after the SOTU. “Nothing’s changed. … I’ve never found out that you can lower costs by spending more.” (Republican Sen. Mitt Romney, standing next to Manchin, said: “You can’t say it better than that!”)

Biden delivered a partisan speech, but it’d be unfair to say he made no effort to appeal to voters outside his base. “We should all agree the answer is not to defund the police,” he said at one point, drawing attention to the murder of two New York City cops last month. “It is to fund the police.” The updated COVID-19 guidance he hinted at and that his administration is reportedly rolling out today sounds like it’ll end up looking pretty similar to where GOP governors have been for months. He closed his address by outlining what he called a “unity agenda,” asking Republicans to work with him on the opioid crisis, children’s mental health, regulating Big Tech, supporting veterans, and “end[ing] cancer as we know it.” 

Biden closed his speech by claiming that the state of the union is strong, “because you, the American people, are strong. We are stronger today than we were a year ago. And we will be stronger a year from now than we are today.”

There were multiple rebuttals to the State of the Union this year—the White House apparently couldn’t convince Democratic Reps. Rashida Tlaib and Colin Allred not to undermine Biden’s message—but the simplicity of Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds’ response served as a reminder of just how much of a glide path Republicans are on to retake Congress in November.

The 62-year-old Reynolds—selected to deliver the GOP’s response by Senate and House Minority Leaders Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy—knocked Biden and Democrats on inflation, the Afghanistan withdrawal (which Biden did not mention in his own address), crime, and school closures. “Keeping schools open is only the start of the pro-parent, pro-family revolution that Republicans are leading in Iowa and in states across this country,” she said. “We’re standing up for parents and kids. We’re standing up for life. We’re keeping our communities safe.”

Reynolds put forth several policy arguments—on energy, immigration, the budget, and more—but some of her most potent few lines were based entirely on vibes. “Americans are tired of a political class trying to remake this country into a place where an elite few tell everyone else what they can and cannot say, what they can and cannot believe,” she said, nodding toward curriculum debates in schools and pandemic restrictions. “The American people [are] waiting to exhale, waiting for the insanity to stop.” 

If Republicans are able to just sit tight and keep the focus on Democrats for the next several months—McConnell’s preferred strategy—polling indicates the country could be in for a historic red wave. But the GOP has plenty of “insanity” on its side, too—and State of the Union viewers were reminded of it on Tuesday. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene tried to start a “Build the wall” chant during the president’s speech and Rep. Lauren Boebert accused Biden of killing the 13 U.S. servicemembers who died in Afghanistan last summer—just as he was talking about the “burn pit” cancer that killed the husband of a military spouse in attendance, as well as his own son.

And then there’s the leader of the GOP, who bracketed Biden’s speech with two statements. The first implored readers to check out the “Office of the Special Counsel Second Interim Investigative Report On the Apparatus & Procedures of the Wisconsin Elections System.” The second tried to explain away his recent praise of Vladimir Putin as “savvy” and “genius.” 

Worth Your Time

  • Christopher Miller has been one of the best reporters on the ground in Ukraine these past few weeks, and his latest dispatch for BuzzFeed News—on Ukrainians attempting to flee Kyiv before Russian airstrikes ramped up—is a harrowing look at what Putin’s aggression has wrought. “They threw themselves, and whatever possessions they were able to take with them, onto the departing train Monday at Kyiv’s central railway station as Russian forces continued to inch closer to the capital city,” he writes. “In the chaos, a young mother was separated from her daughter when a police officer hoisted the girl onto the train, but it began rolling away before the woman could jump on. As she let out a blood-curdling howl, the woman ran alongside the moving car until she was able to grab the outstretched arm of another man who yanked her on board. A pink unicorn backpack the mother had slung over her shoulder didn’t make it and tumbled to the tracks. Thousands of other Ukrainians and foreigners desperately trying to flee Kyiv on Tuesday were left stranded in the freezing cold, largely without food and water, and wondering whether they would be lucky enough to secure a few square inches on some of the last trains out of the Ukrainian capital before Russian forces encircled the city and prepare to pound it with missiles and artillery fire.”

  • In recent days, Ukrainian leaders and a handful of U.S. lawmakers have called for NATO or the U.S. to establish a “no-fly zone” over Ukraine.  In a piece for National Review, Daniel DePetris explains why that is a bad idea. “For the U.S. to carve out an NFZ, it would have to engage Russia militarily,” he writes. “Any Russian weapons system that posed a danger to the mission, whether a Russian plane hovering in Ukrainian airspace or a Russian anti-missile system located on Russia’s side of the border, would need to be destroyed. Dogfights between American and Russian combat aircraft would be highly likely, leading to the high possibility of casualties. … To put it plainly: The U.S. and Russia, which together hold 90 percent of the world’s nuclear warheads, would be waging war against each other.”

  • Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred officially canceled (at least) the first week of the regular season on Tuesday after owners and players failed to come together on a new collective bargaining agreement by the owners’ self-imposed deadline. ESPN’s top baseball reporter Jeff Passan is frustrated with the short-sighted decisions that led us to this point. “Baseball remains a game with incredible upside, with a collection of players young and dynamic and eminently likable. There is ample room for improvement to the sport itself, which has grown too plodding for a wide swath of young, would-be fans who regard it as slow and boring,” he writes. “Eventually, there will be a deal, and it’s likely that when there is, little will have changed about what one official called the game’s “mangled, Frankenstein economic system.” The existential elements of the game—pace of play, capturing young fans, gambling—will have gone untouched at a time when real dialogue could’ve put the game in a far better position. … This is Rob Manfred’s disaster, the league’s disaster, the owners’ disaster, and it’s been a long time coming.”

Presented Without Comment

Also Presented Without Comment

Also Also Presented Without Comment

Toeing the Company Line

  • Does Congress have a role to play in responding to Putin’s invasion of Ukraine? Will Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy actually do anything about Marjorie Taylor Greene and Paul Gosar this time? Is the International Space Station going to crash in India or China? Haley’s latest Uphill has answers.

  • In this week’s Sweep (🔒): A bunch of no-shows at Pennsylvania’s Republican Senate primary debate, surprising polling on the politics of education, Mitch McConnell and Rick Scott’s spat over Republicans’ agenda, and CPAC’s annual straw poll.

  • David’s Tuesday French Press (🔒) ticks through a series of questions readers might have about what’s happened in Ukraine over the past week. How did Russia miscalculate? Can Ukraine actually win this fight? What are the chances Putin’s regime collapses?

  • Not able to tune into last night’s Dispatch Live? Never fear! Dispatch members can access a recording of the conversation here

Let Us Know

If you were President Biden’s speechwriter and given the goal of boosting his approval rating from 41 percent to 45 percent with last night’s address, what themes would you have focused on? 

Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Charlotte Lawson (@lawsonreports), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.