Skip to content
No, the Failed Spending Bill Did Not Include a 40 Percent Pay Raise for Congress
Go to my account

No, the Failed Spending Bill Did Not Include a 40 Percent Pay Raise for Congress

The continuing resolution would have provided lawmakers with a 3.8 percent raise.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks to the press at the Capitol in Washington, D.C, on December 17, 2024. (Photo by Allison Robbert/AFP/Getty Images)

On Wednesday evening, following pressure from President-elect Donald Trump and presidential adviser Elon Musk, House Republicans revolted against a last-minute continuing resolution (CR) that would have extended government funding through March 14, 2025. The bill, which clocked in at more than 1,500 pages, featured dozens of add-ons including disaster relief funding, a jurisdiction transfer for D.C.’s RFK stadium, and commitments to rebuild the collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore.

Also included in the CR was a small but controversial provision that would have raised salaries for members of Congress in 2025. The pay raise sparked widespread accusations online—including from Musk—that members were using the emergency funding bill to bump their salaries by almost 40 percent. Musk, the owner of X and co-chair of the proposed Department of Government Efficiency advisory body, retweeted a post claiming that congressional pay would increase to $243,300.

Dozens of other viral posts made the same claim. “Included in the 1,547 page CR bill is a pay raise for Congress. They currently receive $174,000, as well as reimbursements for meals and lodging,” reads one X post with more than 180,000 views. “Here’s a piece of insanity from this CR: Congress is trying to give themselves a raise to $243,300 a YEAR!” reads another post on Facebook.

The claim is false. A provision in the failed CR would have increased salaries for members of Congress, but only by 3.8 percent.

Congressional salaries have remained the same—$174,000—for more than 15 years. In 1989, the Ethics Reform Act established a formula based on public sector wages that automatically adjusts congressional pay yearly to keep up with cost-of-living increases. Congress, however, has blocked this automatic increase from taking effect since January 2009, when salaries were increased by 2.8 percent to their current level.

In September, Congress passed a CR that included language blocking this automatic wage increase for another year. However, the new CR removed this language, meaning if it had passed, members would have received a pay raise of $6,600—or 3.8 percent—in January 2025, increasing their salaries from $174,000 to $180,600. 

Where does the $243,300 figure cited by the posts come from? According to a report by the CRS, this is what members’ salaries would have risen to by 2024 had Congress not frozen its automatic salary increases since 2009. However, this is not the wage that members would earn if their automatic pay increase for 2025 was unfrozen.

The Dispatch Fact Check has requested comment from Musk. 

If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.

Alex Demas is a fact checker at The Dispatch and is based in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining the company in 2023, he worked in England as a financial journalist and earned his MA in Political Economy at King's College London. When not heroically combating misinformation online, Alex can be found mixing cocktails, watching his beloved soccer team Aston Villa lose a match, or attempting to pet stray cats.

Share with a friend

Your membership includes the ability to share articles with friends. Share this article with a friend by clicking the button below.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.

You are currently using a limited time guest pass and do not have access to commenting. Consider subscribing to join the conversation.

With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.