Sarah Isgur and David French face the muddiness of a case on moving criminal aliens to South Sudan, the messiness of death penalty cases, and the potential abortion distortion of a plain ol’ statutory question. Today’s dessert, though, is analyzing an interview of Justice Samuel Alito by the Hoover Institution.
The Agenda:
—Mark Justice Clarence Thomas off your bingo card
—Supreme Court’s yellow light for moving criminal aliens to third-party countries
—Gutierrez v. Saenz
—Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic
—Sarah’s pet peeve: 18th century life expectancy stats
—Chief + Gorsuch = criminal justice case
—Alito time
This episode is brought to you by Burford Capital, the leading global finance firm focused on law.
Burford helps companies and law firms unlock the value of their legal assets. With a $7.2 billion portfolio and listings on the NYSE and LSE, Burford provides capital to finance high-value commercial litigation and arbitration—without adding cost, risk, or giving up control.
Clients include Fortune 500 companies and Am Law 100 firms, who turn to Burford to pursue strong claims, manage legal costs, and accelerate recoveries.
Learn more at burfordcapital.com/ao.
Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.
With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.