Skip to content
Dispatch Politics Roundup: Summer in Trump’s Washington
Go to my account
General

Dispatch Politics Roundup: Summer in Trump’s Washington

Your weekly roundup from Washington, D.C.

It’s the dog days of summer, that fallow time in August when nothing is growing in the field of politics. Congress is usually on recess, political campaigns are preparing for the final post-Labor Day push to the finish line, and even presidential schedules are relatively light. That’s especially the case in an “off year” like 2025, with the midterm elections still 15 months away.

Of course, these aren’t normal times, and this August has had its share of political activity. There was last week’s summit in Alaska between President Donald Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin, which seems to have achieved, well, not a whole lot in reaching a conclusion to Russia’s war on Ukraine. More productive, and perhaps better for Ukraine, was the meeting Trump held with President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington on Monday, joined by several leaders from the European Union.

To be sure, there are the restrictionist elements in the Trump administration looking to rein in any promises of security guarantees for the Ukrainians, and the result is that America’s position on the war in Ukraine feels as confused as ever.

Meanwhile, the federal takeover of law enforcement in the nation’s capital continued this week. My colleague James Sutton’s reporting is that while the increased presence of federal law enforcement has likely resulted in a significant number of arrests, most of those arrests have been immigration-related and seem primarily to be fulfilling Trump’s goal of immigration enforcement rather than strictly cleaning up D.C’s streets of violent criminals.

But as James also notes, the National Guard soldiers (both from D.C’s own contingent and those from other states) have almost nothing to do with the spate of arrests and have been largely standing guard in front of federal buildings.

The presence of the National Guard is both conspicuous (thanks to the large armored vehicles parked in places like Union Station and near the National Mall) and rather anticlimactic. And the ongoing protests from D.C. residents, including some that interrupted Vice President J.D. Vance’s recent trip across town to Union Station, just feel like part of the norm in Trump’s Washington these days. 

—Mike


Top Stories From the Dispatch Politics Team

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks about the “Election Rigging Response Act” at a press conference at the Democracy Center, Japanese American National Museum on August 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.  (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

Newsom Targets Trump as Redistricting Fight Takes Shape

Gov. Gavin Newsom is asking voters to approve, in a special election this November, a partisan gerrymander of California’s congressional districts and temporarily bypass the independent state redistricting commission charged with mapping House seats. The governor, responding to a similar Republican maneuver in Texas initiated at Trump’s insistence and aimed at preserving the GOP’s thin House majority, is framing the campaign as a choice: Help Democrats check the president in next year’s midterm elections—or empower him.
New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani speaks during a press conference at the 1199SEIU headquarters. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Can MAGA Make Use of Mamdani?

Republicans in Washington and beyond are not only increasingly accepting of the idea that Mamdani is likely to win the November 4 election—they’re getting excited about the prospect that the 33-year-old democratic socialist could be the new face of the Democratic Party as a result. “It’s fantastic,” one Republican strategist close to the White House told me recently, echoing the view of others in the GOP I’ve spoken with. Having Mamdani—who has promised to raise taxes on the wealthy, freeze rents, and establish city-run grocery stores—in Gracie Mansion may not be great for New York, but it’s a gift for Republicans trying to cast the Democrats as too radical and out of touch.
Illustration by Noah Hickey/The Dispatch. (Photos via Unsplash)

The Data Driving the Looming Redistricting War

Following the return this week of Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to deny a quorum, the Texas House of Representatives began its work in the second special session to pass a congressional district map that’s poised to add five Republican seats to the U.S. House. Texas’ actions appear to be the opening salvo in nationwide redistricting wars. As Republicans claim that they are seeking to amend an already flawed distribution of favorable congressional districts, Democrats insist that a reaction on their part would be to undo unfair partisan redistricting by the GOP. Both parties have been guilty of gerrymandering, but determining which party does it more—and how much of an advantage it gives their candidates on Election Day—can be difficult, with different metrics producing different results.
Illustration by Noah Hickey (Photos via Unsplash).

Jewish Democrats Labor to Maintain Party’s Support for Israel

That the Democratic Party’s multigenerational grip on the Jewish vote is slipping amid a shift toward President Donald Trump in 2024 is virtually conventional wisdom in Republican circles. The presumption is certainly not unfounded; it’s bolstered by credible exit and post-election polls. But Democratic strategists focused on Jewish voters insist otherwise.
Illustration by Noah Hickey (Photos by: Allison Robbert/Washington Post/Getty Images; Win McNamee/Getty Images).

Showmanship and Sycophants

Frustratingly for his opponents, Donald Trump has a knack for identifying public policy problems that elites avoid but which have salience with a critical mass of voters—from rampant illegal immigration to the decline of American manufacturing to the cultural takeover of “woke” social conventions. Unfortunately for those who support him, the president has chosen to try to solve these problems through performative gestures rather than doing the difficult work of governing.
The Department of Labor in Washington, D.C. (Photo via Getty Images)

What’s Next for the Bureau of Labor Statistics?

If there was any evidence of the Bureau of Labor Statistics skewing data for political purposes—spoiler alert: there wasn’t—then a president who cared about the integrity of economic data would have selected an impeccably qualified replacement to head the agency, someone with no hint of partisan bias who could restore trust in the numbers. But the president’s advisers and close supporters made it clear that Trump didn’t want a nonpartisan commissioner. He wanted one of “his own people” put in place. And Trump did just that when he announced he would nominate E.J. Antoni, an economist at the Heritage Foundation and a frequent booster of pro-Trump narratives about the economy, to lead the BLS.

Enjoying our Dispatch Politics Roundup? Consider forwarding this article to someone you know who likes independent, fact-based journalism.

Michael Warren is a senior editor at The Dispatch and is based in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining the company in 2023, he was an on-air reporter at CNN and a senior writer at the Weekly Standard. When Mike is not reporting, writing, editing, and podcasting, he is probably spending time with his wife and three sons.

Gift this article to a friend

Your membership includes the ability to share articles with friends. Share this article with a friend by clicking the button below.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.

With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.