Skip to content
Dispatch Politics Roundup: Cabinet Questions
Go to my account
General

Dispatch Politics Roundup: Cabinet Questions

Your weekly roundup from Washington, D.C.

Dear Dispatch readers,

Can the center of Donald Trump’s Washington keep on holding? In the short term, the answer is probably “yes,” but it’s likely a question we’ll keep asking, week after week, for the next few years. That’s because the Trump administration tends to stumble, like a drunk trying to maintain his footing, from one incident or scandal or upheaval to the next. It makes following the news, let alone covering it as a journalist, a dizzying endeavor. 

There’s the ongoing back-and-forth in the courts, where lawsuits over just about everything—from the activities of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency to the deportations of accused illegal immigrants to the implementation of tariffs—threaten to cut short Trump’s agenda while the administration is straight-up defying court orders. Speaking of those tariffs, this week’s apparent market rally, after several weeks of dramatic collapse in response to the announcement of those trade actions, appears to have been a response to a leaked closed-door assurance from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to investors that the trade war would soon be deescalating. That, and Trump backing off his threat to fire Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell.

Meanwhile, as I outlined in my Tuesday column, disarray reigns over in the Defense Department as Secretary Pete Hegseth has ground the Pentagon to a halt thanks to a lack of direction from the top. The scandal over Hegseth’s decision to share battle plans with other administration officials (and, unwittingly, a prominent journalist) over a nonsecure text chain deepened over the weekend when the New York Times reported Hegseth had shared the same plans over text with his wife, his brother (a Pentagon official), and his personal lawyer. That certainly hasn’t helped things, nor has the exodus of most of Hegseth’s inner circle of advisers, most of which were fired as the apparent result of an internal leak investigation.

It all makes my head spin.

Yet it’s important to keep up with what’s happening because despite the feeling of bedlam, Trump and his administration is likely to endure. This was my experience covering his first presidency, when weekly or even daily, it seemed as if the whole administration might collapse under the weight of the chaos, only for Trump and his team to wake up the next day and start all over again.

So stick with us as we try to cover it all and make sense of what’s happening here in Washington. At the very least, it’s never dull.

—Michael


Top Stories From the Dispatch Politics Team

President Donald Trump and members of his Cabinet, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, right, meet with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in the Oval Office on April 17, 2025. (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

Will Pete Hegseth Be Trump’s First Cabinet Casualty?

Chaos and upheaval plague the office of the secretary of defense as the fallout from last month’s “Signalgate” revelations persists. All of it seems to stem from the management style—or lack thereof—of Pete Hegseth. At least one Republican House member is already calling for Hegseth to step down, and despite President Donald Trump’s defense of his defense secretary, NPR has reported that the White House is looking for a replacement.
Rep. Jodey Arrington holds a copy of the Ray Dalio book How Countries Go Broke outside the Capitol Hill Club after a meeting of the House Republican Conference on Tuesday, March 25, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

The GOP Considers the Unthinkable: Tax Hikes

Congressional Republicans are mulling proposals to raise taxes on corporations and wealthy earners. But doing so would end 50 years of principled Republican opposition to tax hikes driven by conservatives and reflect a populist GOP coalition that President Donald Trump has invigorated with working-class voters who formerly affiliated with the Democratic Party. And that ideological heresy is not going over well with conservative activist groups that focus on fiscal issues.
Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, two Democratic members of the Federal Trade Commission seen here in July 2023, were removed by President Donald Trump on March 18, 2025. (Photo by Shuran Huang for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Democrats: Trump’s Executive Actions a Crisis, Not an Example

Following Trump’s firing of Democratic commissioners on the Federal Trade Commission and the director of the National Security Agency, The Dispatch asked Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill whether the precedents being set by Trump could be ones that a future Democratic president would potentially follow. None said they wanted to pursue Trump’s path to affirming the power of the executive. After all, Democratic presidents have also pushed the limit of executive authority, and Republicans have criticized them soundly for it.
Photo illustration by Noah Hickey/The Diispatch. (Photo via Unsplash)

Get Out by Good Friday, Feds Say to Afghan Christians

In North Carolina, Ahmad—an Afghan Christian legally living in the United States—found a job at a restaurant (as parole granted to him legally allowed him to do), improved his English, and has become an integral member of his congregation. But his days of worshipping freely and without fear at Apostles Church may have come to an end last week, after receiving a letter from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) telling him he must leave the country by Good Friday.

Michael Warren is a senior editor at The Dispatch and is based in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining the company in 2023, he was an on-air reporter at CNN and a senior writer at the Weekly Standard. When Mike is not reporting, writing, editing, and podcasting, he is probably spending time with his wife and three sons.

Gift this article to a friend

Your membership includes the ability to share articles with friends. Share this article with a friend by clicking the button below.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.

With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.