Podcasts

Why Should Christians Care About People in Prison?

Jesse Wiese robbed a bank and spent eight-and-a-half years in prison.

After he served his time, he experienced the challenges of reentering society.  He joined the Prison Fellowship, graduating from law school, and is now the vice president of program design and evaluation at Prison Fellowship.  Now he spends his time attempting to help fellow imprisoned people flourish after serving time in prison.

In this episode, Jesse shares his remarkable journey from bank robber to attorney, while David and Curtis discuss the church’s proper spiritual approach to criminal justice, prison reform, criminal justice reform, and the difference between justice and vengeance. 

Show Notes:

-Visiting Prisoners in Jesus’ Day: Helping detained people was a shocking calling in the first century by David Stubbs in Christianity Today.

The Sentencing Project: The Sentencing Project advocates for effective and humane responses to crime that minimize imprisonment and criminalization of youth and adults by promoting racial, ethnic, economic, and gender justice.

-Locked Out: Voices from America’s Second Prison by Jesse Wiese (Editor): Interviews with former prisoners as they relate the ongoing consequences of incarceration long after their debt to society has been paid.

-Matthew 25:31-40: The Scripture which includes, “I was in prison and you came to visit me.”

-Prison Fellowship: Founded in 1976, Prison Fellowship® exists to serve all those affected by crime and incarceration and to see lives and communities restored in and out of prison.

-After Life: My Journey from Incarceration to Freedom Hardcover by Alice Marie Johnson (author), Kim Kardashian (foreword), and Nancy French (collaborator): The true story of the woman whose life sentence for non-violent drug trafficking was commuted by President Donald Trump thanks to the efforts of Kim Kardashian West.

Hosts: David French and Curtis Chang

Producer: Victoria Holmes

Turkish Delights

Today’s Ruminant, recorded live from an undisclosed hotel in the depths of Chicago, finds Jonah even more scatterbrained than usual. Although he begins by discussing the nature of the First Amendment and why Twitter isn’t at the heart and soul of American democracy, he quickly abandons rank punditry and veers in a radically different direction. With a vacation in Istanbul coming up, Jonah tells the long, strange tale of his first visit to the city, which may or may not evoke comparisons to Midnight Express. It’s an unconventional episode, but don’t say you weren’t warned. 

Show Notes:

– Bari Weiss’ “Twitter Files”

– David French: “Elon Musk and Tucker Carlson Don’t Understand the First Amendment”

– Christian Schneider: “Does Nobody Understand How the First Amendment Works?”

– The Remnant with Scott Lincicome

– The Remnant with Jonathan Rauch

– Charlie Cooke and Michael Brendan Dougherty debate Republican electability

Why Mitch Can’t Have Nice Things

Will the aftermath of Herschel Walker’s defeat in Georgia create a rare window for Republican introspection? And can the infotainment right be part of the solution? Sarah, David, Jonah and Steve also discuss what we know (and don’t know) about the Hunter Biden scandal, wonder what ever happened to the Electoral Count Reform Act, and catch up on what’s going on in the rest of the world.

Show Notes:

– The Twitter thread that caught Steve’s eye

Democracy Manifest

Jonathan Rauch, beloved scholar at the otherwise hated Brookings Institution, returns to the Remnant for some spirited kvetching about primaries, polarization, and the state of democracy. He and Jonah also mix in some ruminations on the Republican Party’s dysfunction, the nature of racism in contemporary American society, and how identity politics radicalizes people. Be ready with your bingo cards.

Show Notes:

Jonathan’s page at Brookings

Jonathan’s previous Remnant appearance

Jonathan’s latest book, The Constitution of Knowledge

Jonathan and Ray La Raja: “Too Much Democracy Is Bad for Democracy”

“Toward a More Responsible Two Party System”

Elaine Kamarck: “Is democracy failing and putting our economic system at risk?”

Is This a Lollapalooza?

In an all-star hearing, the Supreme Court considers a melange of legal and philosophical arguments concerning the “independent state legislature” doctrine. But first, David and Sarah revisit 303 Creative and debate the Tough (with a capital T) line between law and morality.
Also: Should Judge Cannon be impeached?

Out of context: “For the record, Sarah, there are Mean Girls in Dune.”

Show Notes:

J. Michael Luttig for The Atlantic against the Independent State Legislature doctrine

We Can Work It Out

Heroic wonksplainer Scott Lincicome is back on the Remnant to discuss his new book, Empowering the American Worker: Market‐​Based Solutions for Today’s Workforce, which examines what effective pro-worker policies should look like in today’s political climate. Predictably, things get nerdy, as the conversation explores education policy, the demands of urban living, and the great vampire-werewolf debate (tune in for clarification). Where is the government going wrong in its approach to the workforce? Can relying on the free market ever create problems? And how bullish should we be about remote work?

Show Notes:

Scott’s newsletter, Capitolism

Scott’s new book, Empowering the American Worker

Scott previews the book in The Dispatch

The Remnant with Russ Roberts 

Ryan Streeter: “Place and the Pursuit of Happiness, Upward Mobility and the American Dream”

Special Master No More

Finally, the Supreme Court hears arguments on Creative 303, the case that asks whether a web designer can refuse to provide her services for a gay wedding. And the hearing was… underwhelming! Also: The 11th Circuit shuts down the Special Master’s review of Mar-a-Lago documents. David and Sarah sum up the ruling as “predictable, even quasi inevitable,” while debating whether or not it “dunked” on judge Cannon.

Show Notes:

303 Creative Oral Argument

Burning Down the House

Finally on the verge of overcoming his lingering COVID symptoms, Jonah approaches today’s rambly Ruminant with renewed verve. After tackling the strangeness of Elon Musk’s Twitter reign and the freakishness of Kanye West, he explores how Trumpification has changed the right and what sane Republicans can do to move forward. From there, things get philosophical, as Jonah examines the nature of ethical universals and what specifically is immoral about authoritarian regimes. Finally, things conclude with some sweet, nourishing dog content.

Show Notes:

The Wednesday G-File

Election denial in Cochise County

Newt Gingrich: “Quit Underestimating President Biden”

The Economist’s Drum Tower podcast

The Remnant with Alexandra Horowitz

Jonah: “Mau-Mauing the Dogcatcher”

What Do We Mean By ‘Progressive’ or ‘Conservative’?

We toss around words like “conservative” and “progressive” without really understanding – or agreeing on – the meaning of these terms.  

This week, David and Curtis discuss how these labels simply don’t work when applied across both theology and politics.

How is the equivocation surrounding these terms misleading and therefore damaging to Christian discourse? Can politics be used as a proxy for faithfulness? If so, when?

Join David and Curtis as they dive deeper into the word “progressive” and “conservative” and attempt to provide clarity on this common, important conversational terminology.

Show Notes:

Check out Curtis’s course on the theology of institutions, called God’s Purpose for Your Organizational Life (free to Good Faith listeners).

Sign up for David’s French Press newsletter

Follow Curtis’ work at RedeemingBabel.org

What Should We Be Doing?

Sarah, David, Jonah and –– believe it or not! –– Steve discuss whether and how the United States should support dissidents in China and Iran, ponder the poetic timing of the Fuentes dinner, and lament the intractability of America’s gun debate. 

Also: why is it so difficult to enjoy America beating Iran in the World Cup (besides it being soccer)?

Also also: will David’s scotch-taped computer survive the whole hour? Listen and find out.

Show Notes:

Kevin Williamson on America’s gun lifestyle

The Brooding Omnipresence of the Law

The AO marathon continues as David and Sarah catch up on Supreme Court hearings. In this feature-length episode, they explore the line between lobbying and bribery, raise eyebrows at the historicity of the “independent legislature” argument, and debate the extent to which the 303 Creative case is about speech. Also: the Jan. 6 prosecutors may have caught their white whale.

Show Notes:

Oath Keepers founder convicted

303 Creative’s oral argument

Puppy Love

It’s been a while since the Remnant featured a dog expert, but today, Dr. Alexandra Horowitz—a professor at Barnard College of Columbia University—joins the program to fill that void. Some seriously rank cynology ensues, as Jonah and Alexandra explore everything you could ever want to know about canine cognition. Do dogs have a unique friendship with humans, or are they just social parasites? Why do dogs react in different ways to different people? And are dog shows a stain on mankind?

Show Notes:

Alexandra’s webpage

Alexandra’s new book, The Year of the Puppy

Alexandra’s previous books: Inside of a Dog

Being a Dog

And Our Dogs, Ourselves

Alexandra: “What Does it Feel Like to Be a Dog?”

The Remnant with Michael H. Parsons (rat guy)

The world’s smartest dog

Tastes Like Chicken

Revitalized after his latest struggle with COVID, Jonah invites AEI senior fellow and foreign policy expert Michael Rubin back to the Remnant to discuss how America should respond to challenges posed by China, Russia, and the Middle East. Should the U.S. government embrace regime change? What’s at stake for the West in Taiwan and Ukraine? And should we be optimistic about liberalism in China and Iran?

Show Notes:

Michael’s page at AEI

Michael: “Why Is the US Never Prepared for Regime Change?”

The Chicken Kiev speech

Paul Kennedy’s The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers

Lin Wells’ memo to Donald Rumsfeld

The Desperate Despots Club

With the war not progressing as smoothly as he might have hoped, Putin turns to Iran for help replenishing Russia’s arsenal. Frederick W. Kagan, director of the Critical Threats Project at AEI, joins David to explain the nature of this alliance-of-convenience and where things could go from here.

Show Notes:

Critical Threats: Ukraine Stream

Critical Threats: Iran Crisis Updates

First Amendment Monday (on a Tuesday)

It’s censor v. censor, as politicians, academics, and journalists from left to right fight over who gets to block whose free speech.

Plus: David and Sarah reconsider their comments about the alleged Alito leak.

Show Notes:

Novoa v. Diaz

Villarreal v. Laredo, Texas

Reason Magazine on the stakes of Villarreal’s lawsuit

David’s piece on the meaning of religious freedom

Nothing to See Here

Last year, Remnant regular Matt Ridley published Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19, which explored the theory that the virus leaked from a laboratory. Today, he’s back on the program to discuss how things have changed since the book’s publication with a suitably COVID-addled Jonah. Has the lab-leak theory become more persuasive? Did the pandemic fuel a backslide in vaccinations? And can Britons and Americans ever resolve their linguistic differences?

Show Notes:

Matt’s latest book, Viral

Matt’s previous Remnant appearance

Matt: “COVID origin case reopened: A lab leak is a legitimate question”

John Barry’s The Great Influenza