Is Joe Biden Trying to Limit Americans to Four Pounds of Red Meat Per Year?

No.

By
107

Over the weekend, Republican politicians and personalities claimed that President Joe Biden’s climate plan would require Americans to cut their red meat consumption by 90 percent, allowing only four pounds of red meat per year. 

https://twitter.com/RealMattCouch/status/1386056856506802177
Start a Free Trial
Get every newsletter and all of The Dispatch. Support quality, fact-based journalism. Get Started ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT? SIGN IN
107
By
Comments (107)
Join The Dispatch to participate in the comments.
 
  1. JohnO

    Biden has given no details how the US would reduce GHG emissions 50% (below a previous baseline, somewhat but not drastically less than a 50% reduction from now's level) in only 9 years. Which to me renders this albeit accurate 'fact check' a bit pedantic. The original article was exploring ways in which this goal could be achieved. And it would in fact have to include onerous and expensive changes, or it's the burden of those in favor to show otherwise, given the magnitude and timescale. I don't see the headline overall as being 'GOP lies about Biden climate plan'.

    Collapse
  2. Avatar photo
    Will Wright

    The Dems know they can only pass budget / spending bills through reconcilation. And without big, popular payouts like $1400 per adult or "childcare" Infrastructure, they're left with wishlist policy proposals to placate the progressive base and fuel GOP attack adds.

    The only red meat news here is an uptick in Nothing Burgers.

    Collapse
  3. Avatar photo
    mgrad92

    A great post, but it needs to be corrected to cite the University of Michigan Center for Sustainable Systems (https://css.umich.edu), not "Michigan University." In the fact-checking business, when credibility is everything, details like that matter.

    Collapse
    1. Avatar photo
      Narwhal

      If someone goes to the Daily Mail for anything other than celeb gossip and bikini pics then they are misusing the internet as a resource for information.

      Collapse
  4. Avatar photo
    rlritt

    I heard that Biden is going to make it illegal for people to wear clown noses when in public because it hides their faces from the satellite cameras spying on US citizens. Pass it around. You can buy clown noses from me for $4 by emailing Imanidiot@comcast

    Collapse
  5. Avatar photo
    Marty

    Trump spent four years governing (if that's the word for it) by telling Big Lies on a regular -- often daily --basis, going out with the Biggest Lie ever, namely, that he won the election. The Trump wing of the Republican Party (which could actually be a majority of the party, it's hard to tell) now continues in the Boss's tradition by attacking the Biden administration with Big Lies. (The Trump wing also still believes, Heaven help us, that Trump won the election.) And Fox News continues its role of promoting those Big Lies as the gospel truth. It's disheartening. There are ample grounds for criticizing the size and scope of Joe Biden's legislative program without resorting to this kind of nonsense, which the right wing press swallows whole and spews out to Trump Nation, who eagerly gobble it down, making them crazier then ever.

    Please pardon the florid metaphor, but it springs from despair, as I become increasingly convinced that the voice of reason (e.g., Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney) will never regain the upper hand in the GOP, which would be bad for the party and worse for the country. I say this as a lifelong registered Independent who is able to vote for reasonable Republicans here in Massachusetts (Governor Charlie Baker, former senator Scott Brown) but is scared to death of the national party's drastic turn to populism, nativism and a no-compromise mindset, which was already brewing during the Bush presidency but speeded up exponentially with the election of Barak Obama. Remember Mitch McConnell saying in early 2009 that his primary goal was to ensure that Obama was a one-term president? That's no way to run an airline.

    Collapse
    1. Jon D

      So if Mitt Romney is your idea of a good Republican, is Joe Manchin your idea of a good Democrat? You think Democrats have shown a willingness to compromise? Regarding the issue at hand, there is a basis for concern amongst us beef eaters: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2019/11/18/are-my-hamburgers-hurting-planet/
      The concern stems from the Democrat propensity to get over-involved in peoples' everyday lives and choices. Remember Bloomberg and the large soda debacle? Liberals who live in big cities and eat tofu have the power.

      Collapse
  6. Avatar photo
    Narwhal

    Politics as performance art. Yuck.

    The federal government can’t impose a nation wide mask mandate, only recommendations. But, sure Biden is going to limit all Americans to four pounds of red meat a year and enforce it.

    Collapse
    1. Avatar photo
      Kmregan7

      Fun anecdote....I had a relative try to talk politics with me (we don't talk politics for various reasons, not least because they tend to end discussions with "leave your liberal BS out of this!" after being challenged)....anyway, they were bringing up the border situation and how Biden should do something and I flat out said "it's almost like Congress should do their jobs and solve the problem by passing some immigration legislation"....sputter..."well, Biden wouldn't sign it anyway, he WANTS the chaos." But at least it brought up the fact that Biden is not dictator of the United States and can't just unilaterally do things, even as much as the executive branch has expanded (again, thanks to Congress not doing their jobs)

      Collapse
  7. Eric L

    I can't decide what is funnier.... Fox News running with the 'one burger a month' story which was patently false on its face to anyone with a brain, or the fact that Donald Trump Jr. "ate four pounds of red meat yesterday".

    Just fools all the way around.

    Collapse
    1. Avatar photo
      JohnF

      16 1/4 pounders should be doable if you focus on it from the moment you get up to the time you go to bed. I'm guessing you won't feel very good about yourself by the time you go to bed, but if you're Donald Trump Jr., that's probably the way you feel every night.

      Collapse
    2. Avatar photo
      rlritt

      I wonder if Trump Jr wants to buy a 1,000 clown noses?

      Collapse
      1. Avatar photo
        Narwhal

        Probably not. But, he might help you sell them if he gets a cut.

        Collapse
        1. Avatar photo
          rlritt

          Do you have his email?

          Collapse
          1. Avatar photo
            Narwhal

            Nope. Try Parler. I’d also suggest raising the price for the clown noses and sourcing their production to Bolivia to entice him.

            Collapse
  8. Avatar photo
    dmklever

    Seems to me that all the worry about cow belches overlooks the big picture. The folks who raise grass-fed beef claim that properly managed pasture in a rotational grazing system sequesters a bunch of carbon. I would be interested to see a study comparing the full cycle greenhouse gas impact of standard beef production practices (e.g. feedlots) vs. a full grass-fed method.

    Collapse
    1. Avatar photo
      rlritt

      You are obviously too smart for this topic discussion.

      Collapse
    2. Jon S

      There have been a few studies done, one below. Most studies I have seen come to the around the same conclusion that pasture raised and finished beef significantly reduces carbon footprint and properly rotated pastured beef is a fairly large net positive. Even the article below doesn't take into account the GHG for feedlot beef that is generated in the production of the feed. it also doesn't take into a account that a properly managed pasture with rotational grazing converts 4X as much CO2 to O2 as a forest. Properly managed grass is one of the densest and fasting growing plants in the world. That is a lot of CO2 to O2.

      https://kb.wisc.edu/dairynutrient/375fsc/page.php?id=48431

      Collapse
      1. Avatar photo
        Marty

        Very interesting information, of which I was unaware. The question is, how many ranchers can be persuaded to stop shipping their cattle to feedlots and switch to a properly managed pasture in a rotational grazing system? What's in it for them? Unless the switch occurs on a very large scale, it won't help.

        Collapse
        1. Avatar photo
          JohnF

          The second question is how many Americans would be unhappy if all burgers cost $7+?

          Collapse
          1. Avatar photo
            Marty

            My goodness, I certainly stirred up a hornet's nest with my comments today! Time to crawl back in my hole and lick my wounds....

            Collapse
        2. Jon D

          Small farmers are better equipped to do rotational grazing than big corporate operations. Yet, here we are, with Mr. Joe wanting to ditch the step up basis rules at death. This will destroy the family farm.

          Collapse
        3. Avatar photo
          Kmregan7

          Having a sister who lives in a city with MULTIPLE feedlots - better smelling air should be way up there with "what's in it for them?" But since they're shipping their cattle to feedlots, I guess they don't have to deal with the smell.

          Collapse
      2. Avatar photo
        rlritt

        You're too smart, too.

        Collapse
      3. Avatar photo
        dmklever

        Thanks!

        Collapse
  9. Avatar photo
    Bill Nelson

    Is this the cow flatulence thing?

    Collapse
    1. Avatar photo
      JohnF

      It's more of a basic cost accounting thing. I just watched an interview with the main investigator of the study. The question they were asking was "What would the effect on GHG production be if red meat consumption was drastically reduced?" (the study didn't actually make any recommendations).
      So, if you start with your quarter-pounder and walk back through the energy required to: Cook that quarter-pounder; transport the ground beef required; prepare that ground beef; slaughter the cow; transport the cow; feed the cow; produce all of the inputs that went into growing that feed, etc etc. etc, you can make a good case.
      However, you can also draw the same kind of comparison to the consumption of avocado toasts in Fargo, ND in January.
      Overall, the point is (and this is the point the lead investigator made) we don't need to go to the extremes every time something like this comes up.

      Collapse
    2. Mads Lindstrøm

      Well, it is cow burping (and not farting) that releases most of the methane. Not that changes anything. Just being in my pedantic corner.

      Collapse
      1. Avatar photo
        rlritt

        Maybe the farmers could add GasX to their feed.

        Collapse
        1. Mads Lindstrøm

          You may be joking, but you are not too far of http://blogs.ifas.ufl.edu/news/2020/09/29/scientists-work-to-cut-greenhouse-gases-one-cow-burp-at-a-time/ :

          "Now new research by DiLorenzo and others shows that a small change to cattle’s diets reduced the animals’ methane emissions by 11%."

          I would much more like they collected the methane, so I can could get a cow burp-mobile.

          Collapse
          1. Avatar photo
            rlritt

            Sounds like a plan. Keep me posted.

            Collapse
    3. Avatar photo
      Isaac P

      Well, bovine methane is a real thing. And yes, it is.

      But at no time has anyone in Biden’s team so much as linked to the University of Michigan report. (The Daily Mail, not knowing any better, kept referring to it as Michigan University.)

      I’m a former journalist, and the leaps and skips required to prop up this nonsense are ridiculous.

      Collapse
      1. Avatar photo
        Jason Gibson

        I refer to it as "that school that must not be named"


        Go Green

        Collapse
        1. Avatar photo
          rlritt

          Go White!

          Collapse
        2. Avatar photo
          Jscottstephenson

          Go Blue!

          Collapse
          1. Jon D

            Go Buckeyes!

            Collapse
  10. Avatar photo
    Victor Clairmont

    If he was I could stand to lose a few pounds.

    Mmmm, beef.

    Collapse
Load More
Worth Your Time

Maximum Security

Three Big Strikes Against ‘Greedflation’

High Energy

Your Life Portfolio—and Ours

Ron DeSantis Sharpens Attacks on Trump

, and

Avatar photo

About Alec Dent

Alec Dent is the culture editor and a staff writer for The Dispatch. He is a graduate of the Hussman School of Journalism and Media at UNC Chapel Hill, and previously oversaw The Dispatch's fact checking team.
More from Alec Dent