The Dispatch
Share this post
Bernie Sanders Once Defended Daniel Ortega's Crackdown on Nicaraguan Citizens
thedispatch.com

Bernie Sanders Once Defended Daniel Ortega's Crackdown on Nicaraguan Citizens

You have to read the letter to believe it.

Jeryl Bier
Feb 25, 2020
11
20
Share this post
Bernie Sanders Once Defended Daniel Ortega's Crackdown on Nicaraguan Citizens
thedispatch.com

In October 1985, a constituent of then-Burlington, Vermont, Mayor Bernard Sanders wrote him a letter to express concern that Sanders's public praise of the Sandinista regime of Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua was unwarranted. In view of Ortega's revocation of "basic human and civil rights," the constituent, a Mr. Edward Pike, insisted that Sanders should reverse his position on the Sandinistas, as well as rescind the sister city designation of Burlington with the Nicaraguan city of Puerto Cabezas. 

Rather than concede the point that the socialist government of Ortega had gone too far, Sanders pushed back in his reply to Pike, asserting that the Sandinistas' "temporary suspension of certain civil liberties is considerably more complex" than Pike described and that Ortega did not intend to "allow their enemy the total freedom to defeat them and destroy their government" as Chile had in the prior decade. "President Ortega and the Nicaraguan government have chosen not to follow that example," Sanders wrote.

To buttress his position, Sanders then invoked several examples from the United States' own past. Curiously enough, Sanders chose the treatment of American Nazis during World War II as his principal illustration. Sanders wrote, "[D]uring World War II, American Nazi's [sic] were not given the freedom to publish newspapers or appear on radio in order to advocate the murder of American soldiers." Sanders does not indicate whether or not he believed this proscription was justified, but rather immediately proceeds to cite the "totally unconstitutional manner [in which] thousands of Japanese Americans on the west coast were herded into concentration camps as a wartime protection measure," which Sanders presumably found unconscionable. Sanders then cited Abraham Lincoln's Civil War "actions which limited civil liberties" "in order to preserve the Union," but leaves his approval or disapproval of Lincoln's actions ambiguous.

While the internment of Japanese Americans in World War II is almost universally condemned in retrospect, American Nazis publicly "advocat[ing] the murder of American soldiers," particularly in the middle of a war with Nazis Germany, smacks of treason. That Sanders, an American politician, would compare Ortega and his oppressive Sandinista regime suspending the civil rights of the Nicaraguan people with the United States fighting Hitler or the federal government led by Lincoln battling the Confederacy is baffling.

 Despite the lengthy (apparent) justification of the actions of Ortega in his letter, Sanders closes with his insistence that his point is not whether the "Nicaraguan government is a good or bad government or whether Pres. Ortega has done the right thing," but rather "whether or not United States has the unilateral right to go to war and destroy a government that President Reagan and members of Congress dislike."

Sanders's letter to Pike first came to light in a February 3 Josh Rogin column in the Washington Post. Rogin wrote that a "Democratic official associated with a rival campaign" sent him the letter along with other documents from the University of Vermont's Sanders archive. Rogin summarized Sanders's response only briefly in his column, writing that "Sanders responded by defending Ortega’s clampdown on human rights, blaming the United States for funding Ortega’s opposition and comparing Ortega’s actions to the U.S. government’s internment of Japanese Americans during World War II."

Asked to clarify Sanders's 1985 comments in the letter, the Sanders's campaign had not responded by the time this article was submitted for publication. Read the letter below.

Photograph of Bernie Sanders by Bauzen/GC Images. Letter to Bernie Sanders courtesy of the Washington Post.

20
Share this post
Bernie Sanders Once Defended Daniel Ortega's Crackdown on Nicaraguan Citizens
thedispatch.com
20 Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only Dispatch Members only can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

Boomer Bob
Feb 25, 2020

Ugh, a rare disappointment with The Dispatch content here. Going back 35 years to present something that’s pretty consistent with what we already know about Bernie + the click bait title = ☹

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
5 replies
Paul Reichardt
Feb 25, 2020

I have no interest in redebating 1980’s Reagan Administration policy in Latin America in this forum, but I don’t think Bernie and the Democrats lose this argument, if it comes up, among voters in 2020, especially millennials. At worst, Sanders sounds like a naïve lefty-peacenik for his verbal support of Ortega in 1985. He also petitioned the Reagan administration to act as a US emissary to find a peaceful resolution in Nicaragua, so it’s not like he was a monolithic ideologue on the issue.

Meanwhile, Reagan—to applause of US conservatives--called the Contras “freedom fighters” who were the “moral equivalent of America’s founding fathers” and then illegally shipped them taxpayer/Iranian funded arms and/or CIA-training to, as a consequence even if unintentional, more effectively murder and torture women and children. It’s an article of faith among conservatives of that era that the good of supporting the Contras outweighed the bad (mostly because they vehemently denied how bad it was) Yet it is somehow supposed to be unconscionable for people on the Left to see Ortega’s early land reforms and reintegration of indigenous Nicaraguans into the democratic process and then to engage in a similar realist pro/con rationalization for their preferred approaches for US policy. I don’t think that the conservative selective-moralism argument will hold much water today. Maybe the Cuba/Fidel issue will play well for the GOP in South Florida, but hardline anti-Castro abuelos were never going to vote for Bernie anyway--though their nietos probably will.

That, and there’s the fact that Trump cozies up to murderous authoritarians twice weekly.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
1 reply
18 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 The Dispatch
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing