The Dispatch
Share this post
Fact Checking Claims That Melbourne Protesters Were ‘Shot in the Back’
thedispatch.com

Fact Checking Claims That Melbourne Protesters Were ‘Shot in the Back’

Police used rubber bullets on demonstrators in Australia.

Alec Dent
Sep 29, 2021
15
8
Share this post
Fact Checking Claims That Melbourne Protesters Were ‘Shot in the Back’
thedispatch.com

A viral tweet claims to show anti-lockdown protesters in Melbourne, Australia, being “shot in the back as they run away from [the police].”

Twitter avatar for @razorback11111Razorback1111 @razorback11111
Aussie’s are being shot in the back as they run away from 👮‍♀️ in Melbourne

September 22nd 2021

1,510 Retweets2,217 Likes

Hundreds of protesters gathered in Melbourne—the capital of the Australian state of Victoria—several days this week to protest vaccine mandates and lockdown measures. In some instances, the protests turned violent and participants clashed with the police. To disperse the crowds, Victoria Police utilized rubber bullets, among other tools.

“I can confirm that Victoria Police were definitely not using live ammunition,” Alex Day, a representative for the Victoria Police, told The Dispatch Fact Check. Day shared a statement from the police department, which said that the officers “were forced to use crowd control equipment including pepper balls, foam baton rounds, smoke round and stinger grenades which deploy rubber pellets.” These tactics have been criticized as police brutality in some corners. 

The Twitter user who shared the video noted in the replies that the police were using rubber bullets, though the replies got significantly less engagement than the original tweet.

The tweet is correct that the protesters were being shot as they ran away from police, but, importantly, they were being shot with rubber bullets, not live ammunition. 

If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.

8
Share this post
Fact Checking Claims That Melbourne Protesters Were ‘Shot in the Back’
thedispatch.com
8 Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only Dispatch Members only can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

Paul K
Sep 29, 2021

What about using little darts with the vaccine in them? The police could disperse the crowd AND vaccinate them at the same time.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
Alex DeLarge
Sep 30, 2021

"the officers “were forced to use crowd control equipment including pepper balls, foam baton rounds, smoke round and stinger grenades which deploy rubber pellets."

If the crowd didn't want to get shot in the back they should have stood still for their beating instead of running away. It's obviously the police who are the real victims here.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
6 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 The Dispatch
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing