Skip to content
Did Kayleigh McEnany Diminish AOC's Status as a Congresswoman?
Go to my account

Did Kayleigh McEnany Diminish AOC’s Status as a Congresswoman?

No.

On Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claimed that White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany diminished her accomplishments by not referring to her as a congresswoman but a “Biden adviser.”

The comment from McEnany came during a press briefing on June 8. McEnany was asked about the “growing movement to either defund or dismantle police forces across the country” and responded:

“Yeah, it’s a really good question. The President is appalled by the Defund the Police movement. The fact that you have sitting congresswomen wanting to defund the police — notably Rashida Tlaib; notably Biden adviser AOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; former Clinton and Eric Holder spokesperson Brian Fallon wanting to defund our police across this country — it is extraordinary.”

Reviewing McEnany’s response shows that Ocasio-Cortez was wrong. While McEnany did indeed call her a “Biden adviser”—a title likely referencing Ocasio-Cortez’s co-chairship of a Biden campaign climate change task force—just before doing so McEnany referred to “sitting congresswomen” and included Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Rashida Tlaib in that description. Ocasio-Cortez and Tlaib have been two of the highest-profile supporters of the Defund the Police movement. Ocasio-Cortez called for cuts to the New York Police Department’s budget in the wake of police brutality protests around the country, and Tlaib said of the Defund the Police movement: “There is real validity in dismantling the current racist system.” 

Ocasio-Cortez’s first tweet relies on a partial quote of what McEnany said. The full quote shows that McEnany indeed referred to her as a congresswoman.

Photograph by Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images.

Alec Dent is a former culture editor and staff writer for The Dispatch.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.