Skip to content
Things Have Never Been Worse? Really?
Go to my account
Politics

Things Have Never Been Worse? Really?

Politicians frequently peddle catastrophism and presentism—and voters buy it.

President Joe Biden delivers remarks on the economy and inflation on January 12, 2023, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

One of the worst things about democracy is the way we talk about it.

For instance, politicians love to talk about “unity,” but our constitutional system was set up to keep unity at bay, preferring a more adversarial approach, pitting faction against faction. Checks and balances, separation of powers, and the divided authorities between the federal and state governments: It’s all predicated on the idea that unity will be rare and temporary. The Constitution places our most cherished liberties on a high shelf, hard to reach during moments of unifying populist passion.

The rhetorical mismatch doesn’t just apply to the mechanisms of democracy but to the culture of democracy too. Democratic “manners” demand that politicians never say the voters are wrong. But competitive elections—essential to any workable definition of democracy—require some voters to be “wrong.” I don’t necessarily mean in their policy preferences (though that’s frequently the case), I just mean elections create winners and losers. And yet, winning politicians, with barely half of the electorate on their side, routinely declare that the “America people have spoken” after every victory.

More to the point, voters are often simply wrong about basic facts going into an election. For instance, the Biden campaign is struggling with an electorate that believes the economy is far worse than it is. To be clear, I didn’t say the economy is good—though that argument can be made. No, President Biden is struggling to convince the electorate that the economy isn’t the worst ever.  

A recent YouGov survey asked voters to say which decade, starting in the 1930s, had the worst economy. A third (32 percent) said the 2020s, our current decade, is the worst, worse even than the 1930s or 1970s. Only 23 percent said the ‘30s and a mere 5 percent named the ’70s as the worst. This is, by any objective measure, wrong. Spectacularly wrong. 

Now, there’s a lot of partisan bias at work here. Only 19 percent of Democrats said ours is the worst decade, and 24 percent did say the 1930s were, but 45 percent of Republicans believe the 2020s are the worst. Still, when nearly 1 in 5 of Democrats wrongly believe things are worse than during the Great Depression, Democrats have got a problem.

This is merely one facet of Biden’s “vibes” problem. Large numbers of Americans (42 percent) think the 2020s are the worst decade for crime, which is just wrong. Twenty-eight percent think the 1940s—World War II, duh—had the “most war.” Only 4 percent named the 1970s and 6 percent cited the 2000s, when America fought, respectively, the Vietnam War and invaded Iraq and Afghanistan. But 19 percent said the current decade had the “most war”—and we’re not at war, though events in Ukraine and Gaza do make the times seem bellicose. From scientific breakthroughs to family unhappiness to racial inequality, lots of Americans just think things have never been worse.

Now, subjectively, there are perfectly valid arguments that things are not going well or that they can or should be going better. But we’re talking about objective judgments here, and objectively huge numbers of Americans are objectively wrong. And in fairness to them, I suspect many people don’t think they’re making objective judgments. When people say, “I’m having the worst day—or decade—ever!” they’re not necessarily being literal. They’re making a vibes declaration.

This is obviously a huge problem for Joe Biden. Thanks in part to the ravages of inflation and high interest rates, and in part to his own shortcomings, he can’t change minds about the economy. But the causality works both ways. Economic realities contribute to negative attitudes and negative attitudes shape how the economy is perceived. And on many fronts, particularly race, Biden is fueling those negative attitudes.

But that explanation is insufficient. Democracy depends on the promise of incremental, cumulative progress. James Madison didn’t want polls to be the measure of the voters’ mood, but elections, which is why we have them constantly at every level of government. Democracy, for Madison, isn’t about unity or agreement, but about argument and disagreement—and constant self-correction.

Thanks to that vision, we’ve made enormous strides. But now, both parties wallow in catastrophism and presentism. Donald Trump—who has the historical memory of a goldfish—falsely screeches that things have never been worse. Yet, as cartoonish as his rhetoric is, he’s making a right-wing version of a common left-wing argument. Indeed, every four years, partisans insist that this is the “most important election ever” and that catastrophe or salvation is on the ballot. Relentlessly crying wolf has fueled the mess we’ve found ourselves in, and perhaps the mess to come.

After all, when you constantly tell people we’re in an existential crisis, the vibes can create the reality—whether it’s warranted by the facts or not.

Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief and co-founder of The Dispatch, based in Washington, D.C. Prior to that, enormous lizards roamed the Earth. More immediately prior to that, Jonah spent two decades at National Review, where he was a senior editor, among other things. He is also a bestselling author, longtime columnist for the Los Angeles Times, commentator for CNN, and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. When he is not writing the G-File or hosting The Remnant podcast, he finds real joy in family time, attending to his dogs and cat, and blaming Steve Hayes for various things.

Share with a friend

Your membership includes the ability to share articles with friends. Share this article with a friend by clicking the button below.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.

You are currently using a limited time guest pass and do not have access to commenting. Consider subscribing to join the conversation.

With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.