Smothered and Covered

David and Sarah discuss the latest polls looking at the 2020 election, the Supreme Court’s ...

By

David and Sarah discuss the latest polls looking at the 2020 election, the Supreme Court’s decision to dismiss a New York gun rights case, and talk with Steven Lehotsky, of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, about how businesses are dealing with liability as they make plans to reopen.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Keep reading with a free account
Create a free Dispatch account to keep reading Get Started ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT? SIGN IN
By
Comments (10)
Join The Dispatch to participate in the comments.
 
  1. Avatar photo
    Pat @ Tavi Hall

    As one of that core on pro-life issues. I am none to sure about whether I'll stick out my Republican loyalty. Not because of Trump but because of what my conservative Christians say about this crises that mirror what women in unexpected pregnancies say. I am watching the culture of death surround me. Are there alternatives? No, I'm aware of that, but will I just skip pulling a lever in the fall? It begins to feel likely.

    Collapse
  2. Avatar photo
    Ed B

    ”Mootness is a looming vessel of process”! I love it!

    Collapse
  3. Avatar photo
    Kevin Johnson

    This was useful, but I was really struck by the absence of substantive views from Sarah and David about how to deal with the liability issue. I can’t remember another issue presented in detail where the protagonists had so little to say about what would be best. Sarah stressed predictability, of course. What gives? Many of us think the US suffers from larger tort reform needs, outlandish medical malpractice costs, ridiculous jury verdicts, etc., all to be balanced with protecting folks from damage. Why didn’t you weigh in? There is, of course, a conservative argument for not using covid for broader policy goals, but just sticking to addressing the crisis. Examining that narrower issue also,useful, of course. Thanks again.

    Collapse
  4. Michael York

    Nothing earth shattering to say, but you are moving up steadily on my personal podcast hit parade. Thank you for your hard work.

    Collapse
  5. Avatar photo
    Pastorfbt

    I don't think we have Waffle House in the Northeast (?). Please explain smothered and covered.😃

    Collapse
  6. Lylegruby

    Why must polling and the 2020 election be discussed in every AO podcast? I'd *much* rather this feed focus on legal issues instead of politics as usual.

    Collapse
  7. Melissa

    Lastly,into don't get me wrong -- I completely enjoy hearing law school banter. I don't know any lawyers very well and I like having a window into a group of experts talking about a specialized field I know little about in an illuminating way. But don't you find some hypocrisy in opening up the podcast bantering about who received the Harvard Law grade inflation and then switching over to talking about the "elites" as in them, over there, the elites? Again, I don't mind the Harvard talk at all and I find it interesting. But it seems that any mention of the "elites" afterwards might more appropriately be "we elites." I don't think it's a bad thing, but it was hard not to notice.

    Collapse
  8. Melissa

    In terms of the proposals to limit litigation against businesses --- How would this work out, if, say, you were an employee of a company in a state in which the governor made decisions that weren't consistent with the advice of medical professionals (but perhaps consistent with the varying advice of the president); this company discontinues whatever support available to employees during the social distancing phase and penalizes workers who, due to health risks, cannot safely report to work? One can imagine an employee with a precondition such as diabetes, asthma, COPD, etc. etc. is unable to safely come to work in a state in which, at the president's behest, the governor has opened the country without proper regard to the safety of vulnerable workers.

    What is in place to protect vulnerable employees, especially in an environment in which various individuals in leadership positions at the federal and state level have demonstrated irresponsibility and disregard for public health?

    Collapse
    1. Melissa

      I'm obviously not a lawyer, but as a nonspecialist I would wonder about these issues.

      Collapse
    2. Melissa

      I would suggest in many of these cases the lawyers seeking litigation can be compared less with hungry sharks circling the water out of greed, but people seeking protective measures for vulnerable citizens.

      Collapse