Happy Anniversary

To distinguish The Remnant’s 400th episode, Jonah thought it would be refreshing to bring on ...

By

To distinguish The Remnant’s 400th episode, Jonah thought it would be refreshing to bring on a guest renowned among fans for his cheerfulness: Kevin Williamson, National Review’s roving correspondent. Together, they take an extra long, extra nerdy voyage through the morass that is modern American politics to determine whether the end times will really be as awesome as Kevin predicted several years ago. Why are young men so dispossessed? Is there any harm in grifting to earn a living? And will January 6 be remembered for presaging the death of American democracy? It’s a conversation that covers everything from cattle trading to Satan’s balls, and we’re grateful to you all for listening. 

Show Notes:

– Kevin’s previous Remnant appearance

– Kevin on the never-ending coup

Start a Free Trial
Get every newsletter and all of The Dispatch. Support quality, fact-based journalism. Get Started ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT? SIGN IN
By
Comments (45)
Join The Dispatch to participate in the comments.
 
  1. Avatar photo
    T.Kalbach

    I enjoyed the episode and always find Kevin Williamson to have valuable insights.
    The Dispatch, I believe, has stated that one of their goals is to address the best version of opposing arguments. This is a good standard. However, I believe Goldberg and Williamson fail to live up to the standard when discussing anti-elite sentiment. Part of the reason for this is that "anti-elite" is not a very good description of the phenomenon. I suspect most populists would whole-heartedly agree with the facile rejoinder "you wouldn't want an average Joe to be your doctor, would you?" (I'm paraphrasing from memory here). This doesn't really respond to what I think the actual complaint is, though. Rather, anti-elitests (and I occasionally include myself in this group) are unconvinced that those who claim the mantle of expertise in order to gain political authority deserve that mantle. Most recently, I can point to the decisions of US military leadership with regards to Afghanistan as justification for this mindset.

    Thank you for your consideration.

    Collapse
  2. TragicMishap

    Kevin: "People who don't like evolution need to get PhDs from Harvard."

    Nathaniel Jeanson: https://answersingenesis.org/bios/nathaniel-jeanson/

    Collapse
  3. Avatar photo
    Ben Connelly

    Do I have amnesia or did you say something about the 400th episode when you had Peter Suderman on?

    For the 500th episode, get that Eastern European guy who did a whole podcast impersonating you for some bizarre and inscrutable purposes.

    In March, I probably would have thought Kevin’s take that the coup is continuing was overblown but increasingly it seems like he’s right. That Eastman memo is worse and worse the more I think about it.

    Collapse
  4. Avatar photo
    The Bell Tower

    I can’t understand why the Deep State is hiding their secret Republican killing vaccine in salad dressing instead of Ivermectin. Jonah, please convey this idea to your chin scratching, elitist friends in the anti-Trump cabal back at the Hall of Doom and tell them to get their shit together over there.

    Collapse
  5. DJ

    As an entrepreneur myself, I appreciated their recognition that success in business does not automatically transfer to politics. Crafting legislation is very hard work that is much, much different from running a top-down enterprise. Same for managing large, permanent bureaucracies. You can't just clap your hands and will things into action.

    Collapse
  6. Pohl

    Please bring Kevin back to elaborate on his nod towards the technocratic/regulatory state around the 40-44’ mark. I want to hear more about the “capital P people” and how no one is qualified to challenge elite opinions unless you go get a PhD in the field. No wonder so many commentators return to their pet topics like a dog to its vomit;they want to stay in their lane. If only. This is why we elect decision-makers who aren’t philosophers or scientists but who have the gift of political prudence...Oh, wait, maybe he’s on to something.

    Collapse
  7. Greg

    Great episode! Thanks for doing this podcast. I've been enjoying it for years.

    Collapse
  8. Avatar photo
    Mkapnick

    Happy 400th! I would just like to add my voice to those would not be upset if KDW was a regular guest on the Remnant. Thanks fellas.

    Collapse
    1. Avatar photo
      Mkapnick

      I mean I know he has been on 5 times but how about monthly? : )

      Collapse
  9. AS Upstate

    Great conversation as always - and happy 400th.

    One thought on the Journal of Sifting. I really like the metaphor. However, to my mind, the sifting of "small problems" to be suggests that questions about pregnancy and abortion must be sifted down to the level of the family and the individual - the only level that has the requisite knowledge and closeness to the situation to make a decision. Utah and Connecticut are very different, but so is every single pregnancy and every woman's life. If just has to sift down to that level.

    Although I am generally in favor of gun regulations, I think it makes sense to "sift" those down to the state or local level. It it's just not possible with abortion and reproductive health.

    So there you go - the American Journal of Sifting" is a pro choice tract!

    Collapse
  10. Avatar photo
    Paul Hoover

    The episode number should be part of the title for each podcast ala Ricochet.

    Collapse
Load More