Skip to content
Yes, Federal Workers Were Ordered to Remove Pronouns From Email Signatures
Go to my account

Yes, Federal Workers Were Ordered to Remove Pronouns From Email Signatures

Agencies issued the instructions after receiving guidance from the Office of Personnel Management.

The Office of Personnel Management headquarters on December 21, 2024, in Washington, D.C. (Michael A. McCoy/Washington Post/Getty Images)

Did President Trump order federal workers to remove pronouns from their email signatures? Several viral social media posts make this claim. “JUST IN: President Trump reportedly has ordered all federal employees to remove pronouns from their email signatures today,” reads one Instagram post with more than 13,000 likes. “BREAKING: Trump administration orders federal employees to remove pronouns from their email signatures by today at 5PM,” reads a similar post on Threads.

The claims are true. While Trump did not explicitly order the removal of notes attached to email signatures specifying the sender’s preferred pronouns, employees of multiple federal agencies have been asked to remove gender pronouns from their email signatures following guidance issued by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) on one of Trump’s executive orders.

On his first day in office, President Trump signed an executive order titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” that broadly instructs federal agencies to terminate activities that do not align with the administration’s recognition of only two sexes. In one section of the order, agencies are instructed to “remove all statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other internal and external messages that promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology, and shall cease issuing such statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications or other messages.”

Last week, in response to Trump’s executive order, OPM sent a memorandum to the heads of federal departments and agencies providing initial guidance on the executive order’s implementation. Though the memorandum did not explicitly reference pronouns in email signatures, it instructed department and agency heads to “take prompt actions to end all agency programs that use taxpayer money to promote or reflect gender ideology,” including by terminating agency programs, removing outward-facing media, and canceling employee trainings that “promote or inculcate gender ideology.” Heads were ordered to take the steps by 5 p.m. ET on Friday, January 31, and asked to report back to OPM on all steps taken to implement the guidance by noon ET on Friday, February 7.

According to reports from the New York Times, ABC News, and CNN, employees at several federal agencies—including the State Department, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Department of Labor—received instructions to remove gender-identifying pronouns from their email signatures following the issuance of OPM’s guidance. “Pronouns and any other information not permitted in the policy must be removed from CDC/ATSDR employee signatures by 5 p.m. ET on Friday,” read one such message sent to employees of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

On Tuesday, a federal lawsuit was filed by multiple plaintiffs in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland requesting an injunction on the executive order.

If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.

Alex Demas is a fact checker at The Dispatch and is based in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining the company in 2023, he worked in England as a financial journalist and earned his MA in Political Economy at King's College London. When not heroically combating misinformation online, Alex can be found mixing cocktails, watching his beloved soccer team Aston Villa lose a match, or attempting to pet stray cats.

Gift this article to a friend

Your membership includes the ability to share articles with friends. Share this article with a friend by clicking the button below.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.

With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.

More From The Dispatch